Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] selftests/bpf: make BPF_CFLAGS stricter with -Wall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 21:40:11 -0800 you wrote:
> Make BPF-side compiler flags stricter by adding -Wall. Fix tons of small
> issues pointed out by compiler immediately after that. That includes newly
> added bpf_for(), bpf_for_each(), and bpf_repeat() macros.
> 
> Andrii Nakryiko (4):
>   selftests/bpf: prevent unused variable warning in bpf_for()
>   selftests/bpf: add __sink() macro to fake variable consumption
>   selftests/bpf: fix lots of silly mistakes pointed out by compiler
>   selftests/bpf: make BPF compiler flags stricter
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,1/4] selftests/bpf: prevent unused variable warning in bpf_for()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2498e6231bfd
  - [bpf-next,2/4] selftests/bpf: add __sink() macro to fake variable consumption
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/713461b895ef
  - [bpf-next,3/4] selftests/bpf: fix lots of silly mistakes pointed out by compiler
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/c8ed66859397
  - [bpf-next,4/4] selftests/bpf: make BPF compiler flags stricter
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/3d5a55ddc255

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux