On 3/7/23 4:50 PM, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 50cfc2388cbc..00b6e1a2edaf 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1512,6 +1512,8 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops {
void *kdata, const void *udata);
int (*reg)(void *kdata);
void (*unreg)(void *kdata);
+ int (*update)(void *kdata, void *old_kdata);
+ int (*validate)(void *kdata);
const struct btf_type *type;
const struct btf_type *value_type;
const char *name;
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index db9f828e9d1e..2abb755e6a3a 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -1117,6 +1117,9 @@ struct tcp_congestion_ops {
int tcp_register_congestion_control(struct tcp_congestion_ops *type);
void tcp_unregister_congestion_control(struct tcp_congestion_ops *type);
+int tcp_update_congestion_control(struct tcp_congestion_ops *type,
+ struct tcp_congestion_ops *old_type);
+int tcp_validate_congestion_control(struct tcp_congestion_ops *ca);
void tcp_assign_congestion_control(struct sock *sk);
void tcp_init_congestion_control(struct sock *sk);
diff --git a/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c b/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
index ff4f89a2b02a..158f14e240d0 100644
--- a/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
+++ b/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
@@ -222,12 +222,18 @@ static void bpf_dummy_unreg(void *kdata)
{
}
+static int bpf_dummy_update(void *kdata, void *old_kdata)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_bpf_dummy_ops = {
.verifier_ops = &bpf_dummy_verifier_ops,
.init = bpf_dummy_init,
.check_member = bpf_dummy_ops_check_member,
.init_member = bpf_dummy_init_member,
.reg = bpf_dummy_reg,
+ .update = bpf_dummy_update,
.unreg = bpf_dummy_unreg,
.name = "bpf_dummy_ops",
};
diff --git a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
index 13fc0c185cd9..e8b27826283e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c
@@ -239,8 +239,6 @@ static int bpf_tcp_ca_init_member(const struct btf_type *t,
if (bpf_obj_name_cpy(tcp_ca->name, utcp_ca->name,
sizeof(tcp_ca->name)) <= 0)
return -EINVAL;
- if (tcp_ca_find(utcp_ca->name))
- return -EEXIST;
This belongs to patch 3 where BPF_F_LINK needs this. move it closer to where it
is actually used.
return 1;
}
@@ -266,13 +264,25 @@ static void bpf_tcp_ca_unreg(void *kdata)
tcp_unregister_congestion_control(kdata);
}
+static int bpf_tcp_ca_update(void *kdata, void *old_kdata)
+{
+ return tcp_update_congestion_control(kdata, old_kdata);
+}
+
+static int bpf_tcp_ca_validate(void *kdata)
+{
+ return tcp_validate_congestion_control(kdata);
+}
+
struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_tcp_congestion_ops = {
.verifier_ops = &bpf_tcp_ca_verifier_ops,
.reg = bpf_tcp_ca_reg,
.unreg = bpf_tcp_ca_unreg,
+ .update = bpf_tcp_ca_update,
.check_member = bpf_tcp_ca_check_member,
.init_member = bpf_tcp_ca_init_member,
.init = bpf_tcp_ca_init,
+ .validate = bpf_tcp_ca_validate,
.name = "tcp_congestion_ops",
};
In general, please move "validate" related bpf changes to patch 3 and "update"
related changes to patch 5. They are bpf specific (including the changes in
bpf_tcp_ca.c) and closer to where it will be used.
Then patch 2 should only have changes in tcp_cong.c as the preparation work for
the later bpf needs. Please cc netdev for patch 2 in the next re-spin.