On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 4:30 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > __has_builtin was passed the macro rather than the actual builtin > feature. The builtin test isn't sufficient and a clang version test > also needs to be performed. > > Fixes: 1bece1351c65 ("perf lock contention: Support old rw_semaphore type") > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Namhyung > --- > tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c > index e6007eaeda1a..141b36d13b19 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/lock_contention.bpf.c > @@ -182,7 +182,13 @@ static inline struct task_struct *get_lock_owner(__u64 lock, __u32 flags) > struct mutex *mutex = (void *)lock; > owner = BPF_CORE_READ(mutex, owner.counter); > } else if (flags == LCB_F_READ || flags == LCB_F_WRITE) { > -#if __has_builtin(bpf_core_type_matches) > + /* > + * Support for the BPF_TYPE_MATCHES argument to the > + * __builtin_preserve_type_info builtin was added at some point during > + * development of clang 15 and it's what is needed for > + * bpf_core_type_matches. > + */ > +#if __has_builtin(__builtin_preserve_type_info) && __clang_major__ >= 15 > if (bpf_core_type_matches(struct rw_semaphore___old)) { > struct rw_semaphore___old *rwsem = (void *)lock; > owner = (unsigned long)BPF_CORE_READ(rwsem, owner); > -- > 2.40.0.rc0.216.gc4246ad0f0-goog >