On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 3:34 PM Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Create a pair of sockets that utilize the congestion control algorithm
> under a particular name. Then switch up this congestion control
> algorithm to another implementation and check whether newly created
> connections using the same cc name now run the new implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 38 ++++++++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/tcp_ca_update.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tcp_ca_update.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> index e980188d4124..caaa9175ee36 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #include "bpf_dctcp.skel.h"
> #include "bpf_cubic.skel.h"
> #include "bpf_tcp_nogpl.skel.h"
> +#include "tcp_ca_update.skel.h"
> #include "bpf_dctcp_release.skel.h"
> #include "tcp_ca_write_sk_pacing.skel.h"
> #include "tcp_ca_incompl_cong_ops.skel.h"
> @@ -381,6 +382,41 @@ static void test_unsupp_cong_op(void)
> libbpf_set_print(old_print_fn);
> }
>
> +static void test_update_ca(void)
> +{
> + struct tcp_ca_update *skel;
> + struct bpf_link *link;
> + int saved_ca1_cnt;
> + int err;
> +
> + skel = tcp_ca_update__open();
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "open"))
> + return;
> +
> + err = tcp_ca_update__load(skel);
tcp_ca_update__open_and_load()
> + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "load")) {
> + tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
I think it's time to generate link holder for each struct_ops map to
the BPF skeleton, and support auto-attach of struct_ops skeleton.
Please do that as a follow up, once this patch set lands.
> + ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
> +
> + do_test("tcp_ca_update", NULL);
> + saved_ca1_cnt = skel->bss->ca1_cnt;
> + ASSERT_GT(saved_ca1_cnt, 0, "ca1_ca1_cnt");
> +
> + err = bpf_link__update_map(link, skel->maps.ca_update_2);
> + ASSERT_OK(err, "update_struct_ops");
> +
> + do_test("tcp_ca_update", NULL);
> + ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->ca1_cnt, saved_ca1_cnt, "ca2_ca1_cnt");
> + ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->ca2_cnt, 0, "ca2_ca2_cnt");
how do we know that struct_ops programs were triggered? what
guarantees that? if nothing, we are just adding another flaky
networking test
> +
> + bpf_link__destroy(link);
> + tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
> +}
> +
> void test_bpf_tcp_ca(void)
> {
> if (test__start_subtest("dctcp"))
> @@ -399,4 +435,6 @@ void test_bpf_tcp_ca(void)
> test_incompl_cong_ops();
> if (test__start_subtest("unsupp_cong_op"))
> test_unsupp_cong_op();
> + if (test__start_subtest("update_ca"))
> + test_update_ca();
> }
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tcp_ca_update.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tcp_ca_update.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..36a04be95df5
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tcp_ca_update.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> +
> +int ca1_cnt = 0;
> +int ca2_cnt = 0;
> +
> +#define USEC_PER_SEC 1000000UL
> +
> +#define min(a, b) ((a) < (b) ? (a) : (b))
> +
> +static inline struct tcp_sock *tcp_sk(const struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + return (struct tcp_sock *)sk;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("struct_ops/ca_update_1_cong_control")
> +void BPF_PROG(ca_update_1_cong_control, struct sock *sk,
> + const struct rate_sample *rs)
> +{
> + ca1_cnt++;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("struct_ops/ca_update_2_cong_control")
> +void BPF_PROG(ca_update_2_cong_control, struct sock *sk,
> + const struct rate_sample *rs)
> +{
> + ca2_cnt++;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("struct_ops/ca_update_ssthresh")
> +__u32 BPF_PROG(ca_update_ssthresh, struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + return tcp_sk(sk)->snd_ssthresh;
> +}
> +
> +SEC("struct_ops/ca_update_undo_cwnd")
> +__u32 BPF_PROG(ca_update_undo_cwnd, struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + return tcp_sk(sk)->snd_cwnd;
> +}
> +
> +SEC(".struct_ops.link")
> +struct tcp_congestion_ops ca_update_1 = {
> + .cong_control = (void *)ca_update_1_cong_control,
> + .ssthresh = (void *)ca_update_ssthresh,
> + .undo_cwnd = (void *)ca_update_undo_cwnd,
> + .name = "tcp_ca_update",
> +};
> +
> +SEC(".struct_ops.link")
> +struct tcp_congestion_ops ca_update_2 = {
> + .cong_control = (void *)ca_update_2_cong_control,
> + .ssthresh = (void *)ca_update_ssthresh,
> + .undo_cwnd = (void *)ca_update_undo_cwnd,
> + .name = "tcp_ca_update",
> +};
please add a test where you combine both .struct_ops and
.struct_ops.link, it's an obvious potentially problematic combination
as I mentioned in previous patches, let's also have a negative test
where bpf_link__update_map() fails
> --
> 2.34.1
>
