Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] libbpf: usdt arm arg parsing support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 4:04 AM Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Parsing of USDT arguments is architecture-specific; on arm it is
> relatively easy since registers used are r[0-10], fp, ip, sp, lr,
> pc. Format is slightly different compared to aarch64; forms are
>
> - "size @ [ reg, #offset ]" for dereferences, for example
>   "-8 @ [ sp, #76 ]" ; " -4 @ [ sp ]"
> - "size @ reg" for register values; for example
>   "-4@r0"
> - "size @ #value" for raw values; for example
>   "-8@#1"
>
> Add support for parsing USDT arguments for ARM architecture.
>
> To test the above changes QEMU's virt[1] board with cortex-a15
> CPU was used. libbpf-bootstrap's usdt example[2] was modified to attach
> to a test program with DTRACE_PROBE1/2/3/4... probes to test different
> combinations.
>
> [1] https://www.qemu.org/docs/master/system/arm/virt.html
> [2] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf-bootstrap/blob/master/examples/c/usdt.bpf.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c b/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
> index 293b7a37f8a1..27a4589eda1c 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/usdt.c
> @@ -1466,6 +1466,86 @@ static int parse_usdt_arg(const char *arg_str, int arg_num, struct usdt_arg_spec
>         return len;
>  }
>
> +#elif defined(__arm__)
> +
> +static int calc_pt_regs_off(const char *reg_name)
> +{
> +       static struct {
> +               const char *name;
> +               size_t pt_regs_off;
> +       } reg_map[] = {
> +               { "r0", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[0]) },
> +               { "r1", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[1]) },
> +               { "r2", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[2]) },
> +               { "r3", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[3]) },
> +               { "r4", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[4]) },
> +               { "r5", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[5]) },
> +               { "r6", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[6]) },
> +               { "r7", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[7]) },
> +               { "r8", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[8]) },
> +               { "r9", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[9]) },
> +               { "r10", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[10]) },
> +               { "fp", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[11]) },
> +               { "ip", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[12]) },
> +               { "sp", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[13]) },
> +               { "lr", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[14]) },
> +               { "pc", offsetof(struct pt_regs, uregs[15]) },
> +       };
> +       int i;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(reg_map); i++) {
> +               if (strcmp(reg_name, reg_map[i].name) == 0)
> +                       return reg_map[i].pt_regs_off;
> +       }
> +
> +       pr_warn("usdt: unrecognized register '%s'\n", reg_name);
> +       return -ENOENT;
> +}
> +
> +static int parse_usdt_arg(const char *arg_str, int arg_num, struct usdt_arg_spec *arg, int *arg_sz)
> +{
> +       char reg_name[16];
> +       int len, reg_off;
> +       long off;
> +
> +       if (sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ \[ %15[a-z0-9], #%ld ] %n",

I've added space before , and applied to bpf-next.

Thanks, it's a nice clean up and wider architecture support!

BTW, I noticed that we don't support fp, ip, lr, and pc (only sp) for
__aarch64__, why such a difference between 32-bit and 64-bit arms?

> +                  arg_sz, reg_name, &off, &len) == 3) {
> +               /* Memory dereference case, e.g., -4@[fp, #96] */
> +               arg->arg_type = USDT_ARG_REG_DEREF;
> +               arg->val_off = off;
> +               reg_off = calc_pt_regs_off(reg_name);
> +               if (reg_off < 0)
> +                       return reg_off;
> +               arg->reg_off = reg_off;
> +       } else if (sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ \[ %15[a-z0-9] ] %n", arg_sz, reg_name, &len) == 2) {
> +               /* Memory dereference case, e.g., -4@[sp] */
> +               arg->arg_type = USDT_ARG_REG_DEREF;
> +               arg->val_off = 0;
> +               reg_off = calc_pt_regs_off(reg_name);
> +               if (reg_off < 0)
> +                       return reg_off;
> +               arg->reg_off = reg_off;
> +       } else if (sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ #%ld %n", arg_sz, &off, &len) == 2) {
> +               /* Constant value case, e.g., 4@#5 */
> +               arg->arg_type = USDT_ARG_CONST;
> +               arg->val_off = off;
> +               arg->reg_off = 0;
> +       } else if (sscanf(arg_str, " %d @ %15[a-z0-9] %n", arg_sz, reg_name, &len) == 2) {
> +               /* Register read case, e.g., -8@r4 */
> +               arg->arg_type = USDT_ARG_REG;
> +               arg->val_off = 0;
> +               reg_off = calc_pt_regs_off(reg_name);
> +               if (reg_off < 0)
> +                       return reg_off;
> +               arg->reg_off = reg_off;
> +       } else {
> +               pr_warn("usdt: unrecognized arg #%d spec '%s'\n", arg_num, arg_str);
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +       }
> +
> +       return len;
> +}
> +
>  #else
>
>  static int parse_usdt_arg(const char *arg_str, int arg_num, struct usdt_arg_spec *arg, int *arg_sz)
> --
> 2.39.1
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux