Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/8] bpf: Maintain the refcount of struct_ops maps directly.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/02, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
The refcount of the kvalue for struct_ops was quite intricate to keep
track of. By no longer utilizing it and replacing it with the refcount
from the struct_ops map, this process became more transparent and
uncomplicated.

Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <kuifeng@xxxxxxxx>
---
  include/linux/bpf.h         |  3 ++
  kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
  kernel/bpf/syscall.c        | 22 ++++++----
  3 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 8b5d0b4c4ada..cb837f42b99d 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct bpf_map_ops {
  	struct bpf_map *(*map_alloc)(union bpf_attr *attr);
  	void (*map_release)(struct bpf_map *map, struct file *map_file);
  	void (*map_free)(struct bpf_map *map);
+	void (*map_free_rcu)(struct bpf_map *map);
  	int (*map_get_next_key)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *next_key);
  	void (*map_release_uref)(struct bpf_map *map);
  	void *(*map_lookup_elem_sys_only)(struct bpf_map *map, void *key);
@@ -1869,8 +1870,10 @@ struct bpf_map *bpf_map_get_with_uref(u32 ufd);
  struct bpf_map *__bpf_map_get(struct fd f);
  void bpf_map_inc(struct bpf_map *map);
  void bpf_map_inc_with_uref(struct bpf_map *map);
+struct bpf_map *__bpf_map_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_map *map, bool uref);
  struct bpf_map * __must_check bpf_map_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_map *map);
  void bpf_map_put_with_uref(struct bpf_map *map);
+void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work);
  void bpf_map_put(struct bpf_map *map);
  void *bpf_map_area_alloc(u64 size, int numa_node);
  void *bpf_map_area_mmapable_alloc(u64 size, int numa_node);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index ece9870cab68..bba03b6b010b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ struct bpf_struct_ops_map {
  	struct bpf_struct_ops_value kvalue;
  };

+static DEFINE_MUTEX(update_mutex);

Defined but unused?

+
  #define VALUE_PREFIX "bpf_struct_ops_"
  #define VALUE_PREFIX_LEN (sizeof(VALUE_PREFIX) - 1)

@@ -249,6 +251,7 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
  	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map = (struct bpf_struct_ops_map *)map;
  	struct bpf_struct_ops_value *uvalue, *kvalue;
  	enum bpf_struct_ops_state state;
+	s64 refcnt;

  	if (unlikely(*(u32 *)key != 0))
  		return -ENOENT;
@@ -261,13 +264,13 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
  		return 0;
  	}

-	/* No lock is needed.  state and refcnt do not need
-	 * to be updated together under atomic context.
-	 */
  	uvalue = value;
  	memcpy(uvalue, st_map->uvalue, map->value_size);
  	uvalue->state = state;
-	refcount_set(&uvalue->refcnt, refcount_read(&kvalue->refcnt));
+
+	refcnt = atomic64_read(&map->refcnt) - atomic64_read(&map->usercnt);
+	refcount_set(&uvalue->refcnt,
+		     refcnt > 0 ? refcnt : 0);

  	return 0;
  }
@@ -491,7 +494,6 @@ static int bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
  		*(unsigned long *)(udata + moff) = prog->aux->id;
  	}

-	refcount_set(&kvalue->refcnt, 1);
  	bpf_map_inc(map);

  	set_memory_rox((long)st_map->image, 1);
@@ -536,8 +538,7 @@ static int bpf_struct_ops_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
  	switch (prev_state) {
  	case BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_INUSE:
  		st_map->st_ops->unreg(&st_map->kvalue.data);
-		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&st_map->kvalue.refcnt))
-			bpf_map_put(map);
+		bpf_map_put(map);
  		return 0;
  	case BPF_STRUCT_OPS_STATE_TOBEFREE:
  		return -EINPROGRESS;
@@ -582,6 +583,38 @@ static void bpf_struct_ops_map_free(struct bpf_map *map)
  	bpf_map_area_free(st_map);
  }

+static void bpf_struct_ops_map_free_wq(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map;
+
+	st_map = container_of(head, struct bpf_struct_ops_map, rcu);
+
+	/* bpf_map_free_deferred should not be called in a RCU callback. */
+	INIT_WORK(&st_map->map.work, bpf_map_free_deferred);
+	queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &st_map->map.work);
+}
+
+static void bpf_struct_ops_map_free_rcu(struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map = (struct bpf_struct_ops_map *)map;
+
+	/* Wait for a grace period of RCU. Then, post the map_free
+	 * work to the system_unbound_wq workqueue to free resources.
+	 *
+	 * The struct_ops's function may switch to another struct_ops.
+	 *
+	 * For example, bpf_tcp_cc_x->init() may switch to
+	 * another tcp_cc_y by calling
+	 * setsockopt(TCP_CONGESTION, "tcp_cc_y").
+	 * During the switch,  bpf_struct_ops_put(tcp_cc_x) is called
+	 * and its refcount may reach 0 which then free its
+	 * trampoline image while tcp_cc_x is still running.

"is still running" where? Why existing deferred work doesn't protect
against this condition?

+	 *
+	 * Thus, a rcu grace period is needed here.
+	 */
+	call_rcu(&st_map->rcu, bpf_struct_ops_map_free_wq);
+}
+
  static int bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc_check(union bpf_attr *attr)
  {
  	if (attr->key_size != sizeof(unsigned int) || attr->max_entries != 1 ||
@@ -646,6 +679,7 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops bpf_struct_ops_map_ops = {
  	.map_alloc_check = bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc_check,
  	.map_alloc = bpf_struct_ops_map_alloc,

[..]

  	.map_free = bpf_struct_ops_map_free,

Since we have map_free_rcu check in bpf_map_put, does it mean the above
is not needed?

+	.map_free_rcu = bpf_struct_ops_map_free_rcu,
  	.map_get_next_key = bpf_struct_ops_map_get_next_key,
  	.map_lookup_elem = bpf_struct_ops_map_lookup_elem,
  	.map_delete_elem = bpf_struct_ops_map_delete_elem,
@@ -660,41 +694,23 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops bpf_struct_ops_map_ops = {
  bool bpf_struct_ops_get(const void *kdata)
  {
  	struct bpf_struct_ops_value *kvalue;
+	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map;
+	struct bpf_map *map;

  	kvalue = container_of(kdata, struct bpf_struct_ops_value, data);
+	st_map = container_of(kvalue, struct bpf_struct_ops_map, kvalue);

-	return refcount_inc_not_zero(&kvalue->refcnt);
-}
-
-static void bpf_struct_ops_put_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
-{
-	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map;
-
-	st_map = container_of(head, struct bpf_struct_ops_map, rcu);
-	bpf_map_put(&st_map->map);
+	map = __bpf_map_inc_not_zero(&st_map->map, false);
+	return !IS_ERR(map);
  }

  void bpf_struct_ops_put(const void *kdata)
  {
  	struct bpf_struct_ops_value *kvalue;
+	struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map;

  	kvalue = container_of(kdata, struct bpf_struct_ops_value, data);
-	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&kvalue->refcnt)) {
-		struct bpf_struct_ops_map *st_map;
-
-		st_map = container_of(kvalue, struct bpf_struct_ops_map,
-				      kvalue);
-		/* The struct_ops's function may switch to another struct_ops.
-		 *
-		 * For example, bpf_tcp_cc_x->init() may switch to
-		 * another tcp_cc_y by calling
-		 * setsockopt(TCP_CONGESTION, "tcp_cc_y").
-		 * During the switch,  bpf_struct_ops_put(tcp_cc_x) is called
-		 * and its map->refcnt may reach 0 which then free its
-		 * trampoline image while tcp_cc_x is still running.
-		 *
-		 * Thus, a rcu grace period is needed here.
-		 */
-		call_rcu(&st_map->rcu, bpf_struct_ops_put_rcu);
-	}
+	st_map = container_of(kvalue, struct bpf_struct_ops_map, kvalue);
+
+	bpf_map_put(&st_map->map);
  }
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index cda8d00f3762..358a0e40555e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -684,7 +684,7 @@ void bpf_obj_free_fields(const struct btf_record *rec, void *obj)
  }

  /* called from workqueue */
-static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
+void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
  {
  	struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work);
  	struct btf_field_offs *foffs = map->field_offs;
@@ -715,6 +715,15 @@ static void bpf_map_put_uref(struct bpf_map *map)
  	}
  }

+static void bpf_map_put_wq(struct bpf_map *map)
+{
+	INIT_WORK(&map->work, bpf_map_free_deferred);
+	/* Avoid spawning kworkers, since they all might contend
+	 * for the same mutex like slab_mutex.
+	 */
+	queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &map->work);
+}
+
  /* decrement map refcnt and schedule it for freeing via workqueue
   * (underlying map implementation ops->map_free() might sleep)
   */
@@ -724,11 +733,10 @@ void bpf_map_put(struct bpf_map *map)
  		/* bpf_map_free_id() must be called first */
  		bpf_map_free_id(map);
  		btf_put(map->btf);
-		INIT_WORK(&map->work, bpf_map_free_deferred);
-		/* Avoid spawning kworkers, since they all might contend
-		 * for the same mutex like slab_mutex.
-		 */
-		queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &map->work);
+		if (map->ops->map_free_rcu)
+			map->ops->map_free_rcu(map);
+		else
+			bpf_map_put_wq(map);
  	}
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_map_put);
@@ -1276,7 +1284,7 @@ struct bpf_map *bpf_map_get_with_uref(u32 ufd)
  }

  /* map_idr_lock should have been held */
-static struct bpf_map *__bpf_map_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_map *map, bool uref)
+struct bpf_map *__bpf_map_inc_not_zero(struct bpf_map *map, bool uref)
  {
  	int refold;

--
2.30.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux