From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx>
__bpf_selem_unlink_storage is taking the spin lock and there is
no name collision also. Having the preceding '__' is confusing
when reviewing the later patch.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
index acedf6b07c54..fef75beaf66d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_local_storage.c
@@ -216,8 +216,8 @@ static bool bpf_selem_unlink_storage_nolock(struct bpf_local_storage *local_stor
return free_local_storage;
}
-static void __bpf_selem_unlink_storage(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
- bool use_trace_rcu)
+static void bpf_selem_unlink_storage(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem,
+ bool use_trace_rcu)
{
struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage;
bool free_local_storage = false;
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ void bpf_selem_unlink(struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem, bool use_trace_rcu)
* the local_storage.
*/
bpf_selem_unlink_map(selem);
- __bpf_selem_unlink_storage(selem, use_trace_rcu);
+ bpf_selem_unlink_storage(selem, use_trace_rcu);
}
/* If cacheit_lockit is false, this lookup function is lockless */
--
2.30.2
