Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3] selftests/bpf: Set __BITS_PER_LONG if target is bpf for LoongArch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 20:03:01 +0800 you wrote:
> If target is bpf, there is no __loongarch__ definition, __BITS_PER_LONG
> defaults to 32, __NR_nanosleep is not defined:
> 
>   #if defined(__ARCH_WANT_TIME32_SYSCALLS) || __BITS_PER_LONG != 32
>   #define __NR_nanosleep 101
>   __SC_3264(__NR_nanosleep, sys_nanosleep_time32, sys_nanosleep)
>   #endif
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v3] selftests/bpf: Set __BITS_PER_LONG if target is bpf for LoongArch
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/be35f4af719c

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux