On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 2:37 AM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > v2: Modify patch #3 to avoid breaking user_ringbuf test on x86 > > Tiezhu Yang (3): > libbpf: Use struct user_pt_regs to define __PT_REGS_CAST() for > LoongArch > selftests/bpf: Check __TARGET_ARCH_loongarch if target is bpf for > LoongArch > selftests/bpf: Use __NR_prlimit64 instead of __NR_getrlimit in > user_ringbuf test I've applied patches 1 and 3 to bpf-next, but we can't do what patch 2 does. Also, please provide a proper cover letter message next time, just version log isn't enough. > > tools/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h | 2 +- > tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h | 2 ++ > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/user_ringbuf.c | 2 +- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/user_ringbuf_success.c | 2 +- > 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.1.0 >