Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] Fix some build errors for bpf selftest on LoongArch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 2:37 AM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> v2: Modify patch #3 to avoid breaking user_ringbuf test on x86
>
> Tiezhu Yang (3):
>   libbpf: Use struct user_pt_regs to define __PT_REGS_CAST() for
>     LoongArch
>   selftests/bpf: Check __TARGET_ARCH_loongarch if target is bpf for
>     LoongArch
>   selftests/bpf: Use __NR_prlimit64 instead of __NR_getrlimit in
>     user_ringbuf test

I've applied patches 1 and 3 to bpf-next, but we can't do what patch 2
does. Also, please provide a proper cover letter message next time,
just version log isn't enough.

>
>  tools/include/uapi/asm/bitsperlong.h                     | 2 +-
>  tools/lib/bpf/bpf_tracing.h                              | 2 ++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/user_ringbuf.c    | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/user_ringbuf_success.c | 2 +-
>  4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.1.0
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux