Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/12] bpf: Support 64-bit pointers to kfuncs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2023-02-24 at 16:02 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 12:43 PM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 2023-02-23 at 09:17 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 2:37 PM Ilya Leoshkevich
> > > <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > v2:
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230215235931.380197-1-iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> > > > v2 -> v3: Drop BPF_HELPER_CALL (Alexei).
> > > >           Drop the merged check_subprogs() cleanup.
> > > >           Adjust arm, sparc and i386 JITs.
> > > >           Fix a few portability issues in test_verifier.
> > > >           Fix a few sparc64 issues.
> > > >           Trim s390x denylist.
> > > 
> > > I don't think it's a good idea to change a bunch of JITs
> > > that you cannot test just to address the s390 issue.
> > > Please figure out an approach that none of the JITs need changes.
> > 
> > What level of testing for these JITs would you find acceptable?
> 
> Just find a way to avoid changing them.

Ok. But please take a look at patches 1-6. They fix existing issues,
which were found by running test_verifier on arm and sparc64.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux