On 02/23, Aditi Ghag wrote:
Batch UDP sockets from BPF iterator that allows for overlapping locking
semantics in BPF/kernel helpers executed in BPF programs. This
facilitates
BPF socket destroy kfunc (introduced by follow-up patches) to execute from
BPF iterator programs.
Previously, BPF iterators acquired the sock lock and sockets hash table
bucket lock while executing BPF programs. This prevented BPF helpers that
again acquire these locks to be executed from BPF iterators. With the
batching approach, we acquire a bucket lock, batch all the bucket sockets,
and then release the bucket lock. This enables BPF or kernel helpers to
skip sock locking when invoked in the supported BPF contexts.
The batching logic is similar to the logic implemented in TCP iterator:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210701200613.1036157-1-kafai@xxxxxx/.
Suggested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Aditi Ghag <aditi.ghag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/udp.c | 224 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 215 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index c605d171eb2d..2f3978de45f2 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -3152,6 +3152,141 @@ struct bpf_iter__udp {
int bucket __aligned(8);
};
+struct bpf_udp_iter_state {
+ struct udp_iter_state state;
[..]
+ unsigned int cur_sk;
+ unsigned int end_sk;
+ unsigned int max_sk;
+ struct sock **batch;
+ bool st_bucket_done;
Any change we can generalize some of those across tcp & udp? I haven't
looked too deep, but a lot of things look like a plain copy-paste
from tcp batching. Or not worth it?
+};
+
+static unsigned short seq_file_family(const struct seq_file *seq);
+static int bpf_iter_udp_realloc_batch(struct bpf_udp_iter_state *iter,
+ unsigned int new_batch_sz);
+
+static inline bool seq_sk_match(struct seq_file *seq, const struct sock
*sk)
+{
+ unsigned short family = seq_file_family(seq);
+
+ /* AF_UNSPEC is used as a match all */
+ return ((family == AF_UNSPEC || family == sk->sk_family) &&
+ net_eq(sock_net(sk), seq_file_net(seq)));
+}
+
+static struct sock *bpf_iter_udp_batch(struct seq_file *seq)
+{
+ struct bpf_udp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
+ struct udp_iter_state *state = &iter->state;
+ struct net *net = seq_file_net(seq);
+ struct udp_seq_afinfo *afinfo = state->bpf_seq_afinfo;
+ struct udp_table *udptable;
+ struct sock *first_sk = NULL;
+ struct sock *sk;
+ unsigned int bucket_sks = 0;
+ bool first;
+ bool resized = false;
+
+ /* The current batch is done, so advance the bucket. */
+ if (iter->st_bucket_done)
+ state->bucket++;
+
+ udptable = udp_get_table_afinfo(afinfo, net);
+
+again:
+ /* New batch for the next bucket.
+ * Iterate over the hash table to find a bucket with sockets matching
+ * the iterator attributes, and return the first matching socket from
+ * the bucket. The remaining matched sockets from the bucket are batched
+ * before releasing the bucket lock. This allows BPF programs that are
+ * called in seq_show to acquire the bucket lock if needed.
+ */
+ iter->cur_sk = 0;
+ iter->end_sk = 0;
+ iter->st_bucket_done = false;
+ first = true;
+
+ for (; state->bucket <= udptable->mask; state->bucket++) {
+ struct udp_hslot *hslot = &udptable->hash[state->bucket];
+
+ if (hlist_empty(&hslot->head))
+ continue;
+
+ spin_lock_bh(&hslot->lock);
+ sk_for_each(sk, &hslot->head) {
+ if (seq_sk_match(seq, sk)) {
+ if (first) {
+ first_sk = sk;
+ first = false;
+ }
+ if (iter->end_sk < iter->max_sk) {
+ sock_hold(sk);
+ iter->batch[iter->end_sk++] = sk;
+ }
+ bucket_sks++;
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock_bh(&hslot->lock);
+ if (first_sk)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ /* All done: no batch made. */
+ if (!first_sk)
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (iter->end_sk == bucket_sks) {
+ /* Batching is done for the current bucket; return the first
+ * socket to be iterated from the batch.
+ */
+ iter->st_bucket_done = true;
+ return first_sk;
+ }
+ if (!resized && !bpf_iter_udp_realloc_batch(iter, bucket_sks * 3 / 2)) {
+ resized = true;
+ /* Go back to the previous bucket to resize its batch. */
+ state->bucket--;
+ goto again;
+ }
+ return first_sk;
+}
+
+static void *bpf_iter_udp_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t
*pos)
+{
+ struct bpf_udp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
+ struct sock *sk;
+
+ /* Whenever seq_next() is called, the iter->cur_sk is
+ * done with seq_show(), so unref the iter->cur_sk.
+ */
+ if (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
+ sock_put(iter->batch[iter->cur_sk++]);
+
+ /* After updating iter->cur_sk, check if there are more sockets
+ * available in the current bucket batch.
+ */
+ if (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk) {
+ sk = iter->batch[iter->cur_sk];
+ } else {
+ // Prepare a new batch.
+ sk = bpf_iter_udp_batch(seq);
+ }
+
+ ++*pos;
+ return sk;
+}
+
+static void *bpf_iter_udp_seq_start(struct seq_file *seq, loff_t *pos)
+{
+ /* bpf iter does not support lseek, so it always
+ * continue from where it was stop()-ped.
+ */
+ if (*pos)
+ return bpf_iter_udp_batch(seq);
+
+ return SEQ_START_TOKEN;
+}
+
static int udp_prog_seq_show(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_iter_meta
*meta,
struct udp_sock *udp_sk, uid_t uid, int bucket)
{
@@ -3172,18 +3307,34 @@ static int bpf_iter_udp_seq_show(struct seq_file
*seq, void *v)
struct bpf_prog *prog;
struct sock *sk = v;
uid_t uid;
+ bool slow;
+ int rc;
if (v == SEQ_START_TOKEN)
return 0;
+ slow = lock_sock_fast(sk);
Hm, I missed the fact that we're already using fast lock in the tcp batching
as well. Should we not use fask locks here? On a loaded system it's
probably fair to pay some backlog processing in the path that goes
over every socket (here)? Martin, WDYT?
+
+ if (unlikely(sk_unhashed(sk))) {
+ rc = SEQ_SKIP;
+ goto unlock;
+ }
+
uid = from_kuid_munged(seq_user_ns(seq), sock_i_uid(sk));
meta.seq = seq;
prog = bpf_iter_get_info(&meta, false);
- return udp_prog_seq_show(prog, &meta, v, uid, state->bucket);
+ rc = udp_prog_seq_show(prog, &meta, v, uid, state->bucket);
+
+unlock:
+ unlock_sock_fast(sk, slow);
+ return rc;
}
+static void bpf_iter_udp_unref_batch(struct bpf_udp_iter_state *iter);
Why forward declaration? Why not define the function here?
+
static void bpf_iter_udp_seq_stop(struct seq_file *seq, void *v)
{
+ struct bpf_udp_iter_state *iter = seq->private;
struct bpf_iter_meta meta;
struct bpf_prog *prog;
@@ -3194,15 +3345,31 @@ static void bpf_iter_udp_seq_stop(struct seq_file
*seq, void *v)
(void)udp_prog_seq_show(prog, &meta, v, 0, 0);
}
- udp_seq_stop(seq, v);
+ if (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk) {
+ bpf_iter_udp_unref_batch(iter);
+ iter->st_bucket_done = false;
+ }
}
static const struct seq_operations bpf_iter_udp_seq_ops = {
- .start = udp_seq_start,
- .next = udp_seq_next,
+ .start = bpf_iter_udp_seq_start,
+ .next = bpf_iter_udp_seq_next,
.stop = bpf_iter_udp_seq_stop,
.show = bpf_iter_udp_seq_show,
};
+
+static unsigned short seq_file_family(const struct seq_file *seq)
+{
+ const struct udp_seq_afinfo *afinfo;
+
+ /* BPF iterator: bpf programs to filter sockets. */
+ if (seq->op == &bpf_iter_udp_seq_ops)
+ return AF_UNSPEC;
+
+ /* Proc fs iterator */
+ afinfo = pde_data(file_inode(seq->file));
+ return afinfo->family;
+}
#endif
const struct seq_operations udp_seq_ops = {
@@ -3413,9 +3580,38 @@ static struct pernet_operations __net_initdata
udp_sysctl_ops = {
DEFINE_BPF_ITER_FUNC(udp, struct bpf_iter_meta *meta,
struct udp_sock *udp_sk, uid_t uid, int bucket)
+static void bpf_iter_udp_unref_batch(struct bpf_udp_iter_state *iter)
+{
+ while (iter->cur_sk < iter->end_sk)
+ sock_put(iter->batch[iter->cur_sk++]);
+}
+
+static int bpf_iter_udp_realloc_batch(struct bpf_udp_iter_state *iter,
+ unsigned int new_batch_sz)
+{
+ struct sock **new_batch;
+
+ new_batch = kvmalloc_array(new_batch_sz, sizeof(*new_batch),
+ GFP_USER | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ if (!new_batch)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ bpf_iter_udp_unref_batch(iter);
+ kvfree(iter->batch);
+ iter->batch = new_batch;
+ iter->max_sk = new_batch_sz;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+#define INIT_BATCH_SZ 16
+
+static void bpf_iter_fini_udp(void *priv_data);
+
static int bpf_iter_init_udp(void *priv_data, struct bpf_iter_aux_info
*aux)
{
- struct udp_iter_state *st = priv_data;
+ struct bpf_udp_iter_state *iter = priv_data;
+ struct udp_iter_state *st = &iter->state;
struct udp_seq_afinfo *afinfo;
int ret;
@@ -3427,24 +3623,34 @@ static int bpf_iter_init_udp(void *priv_data,
struct bpf_iter_aux_info *aux)
afinfo->udp_table = NULL;
st->bpf_seq_afinfo = afinfo;
ret = bpf_iter_init_seq_net(priv_data, aux);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret) {
kfree(afinfo);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ ret = bpf_iter_udp_realloc_batch(iter, INIT_BATCH_SZ);
+ if (ret) {
+ bpf_iter_fini_seq_net(priv_data);
Leaking afinfo here? Since we are not feeing it from bpf_iter_fini_udp
any more? (why?)
+ return ret;
+ }
+ iter->cur_sk = 0;
+ iter->end_sk = 0;
+
return ret;
}
static void bpf_iter_fini_udp(void *priv_data)
{
- struct udp_iter_state *st = priv_data;
+ struct bpf_udp_iter_state *iter = priv_data;
- kfree(st->bpf_seq_afinfo);
bpf_iter_fini_seq_net(priv_data);
+ kfree(iter->batch);
}
static const struct bpf_iter_seq_info udp_seq_info = {
.seq_ops = &bpf_iter_udp_seq_ops,
.init_seq_private = bpf_iter_init_udp,
.fini_seq_private = bpf_iter_fini_udp,
- .seq_priv_size = sizeof(struct udp_iter_state),
+ .seq_priv_size = sizeof(struct bpf_udp_iter_state),
};
static struct bpf_iter_reg udp_reg_info = {
--
2.34.1
