Re: bpf: Question about odd BPF verifier behaviour

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 22:35 +0000, Matt Bobrowski wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Whilst in the midst of testing a v5.19 to v6.1 kernel upgrade, we
> happened to notice that one of our sleepable LSM based eBPF programs
> was failing to load on the newer v6.1 kernel. Using the below trivial
> eBPF program as our reproducer:
> 
> #include "vmlinux.h"
> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> 
> char LICENSE[] SEC("license") = "Dual BSD/GPL";
> 
> SEC("lsm.s/bprm_committed_creds")
> int BPF_PROG(dbg, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> {
> 	char buf[64] = {0};
> 	bpf_ima_file_hash(bprm->file, buf, sizeof(buf));
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> The verifier emits the following error message when attempting to load
> the above eBPF program:
> 
> -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
> reg type unsupported for arg#0 function dbg#5
> 0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
> ; int BPF_PROG(dbg, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> 0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
> func 'bpf_lsm_bprm_committed_creds' arg0 has btf_id 137293 type STRUCT 'linux_binprm'
> 1: R1_w=ptr_linux_binprm(off=0,imm=0)
> 1: (b7) r2 = 0                        ; R2_w=0
> ; char buf[64] = {0};
> [...]
> ; bpf_ima_file_hash(bprm->file, buf, 64);
> 10: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +64)        ; R1_w=ptr_file(off=0,imm=0)
> 11: (bf) r2 = r10                     ; R2_w=fp0 R10=fp0
> ; 
> 12: (07) r2 += -64                    ; R2_w=fp-64
> ; bpf_ima_file_hash(bprm->file, buf, 64);
> 13: (b7) r3 = 64                      ; R3_w=64
> 14: (85) call bpf_ima_file_hash#193
> cannot access ptr member next with moff 0 in struct llist_node with off 0 size 1
> R1 is of type file but file is expected
> processed 15 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
> -- END PROG LOAD LOG --
> 
> What particularly strikes out at me is the following 2 lines returned
> in the error message:
> 
> cannot access ptr member next with moff 0 in struct llist_node with off 0 size 1
> R1 is of type file but file is expected

Hi Matt,

I tried your program as a ./test_progs test using v6.1 kernel and
don't see any error messages:

VERIFIER LOG:
=============
func#0 @0
reg type unsupported for arg#0 function dbg#5
0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
; int BPF_PROG(dbg, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
func 'bpf_lsm_bprm_committed_creds' arg0 has btf_id 3061 type STRUCT 'linux_binprm'
1: R1_w=ptr_linux_binprm(off=0,imm=0)
1: (b7) r2 = 0                        ; R2_w=0
; char buf[64] = {0};
2: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = r2
last_idx 2 first_idx 0
regs=4 stack=0 before 1: (b7) r2 = 0
3: R2_w=P0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=00000000
3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r2        ; R2_w=P0 R10=fp0 fp-16_w=00000000
4: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -24) = r2        ; R2_w=P0 R10=fp0 fp-24_w=00000000
5: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -32) = r2        ; R2_w=P0 R10=fp0 fp-32_w=00000000
6: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -40) = r2        ; R2_w=P0 R10=fp0 fp-40_w=00000000
7: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -48) = r2        ; R2_w=P0 R10=fp0 fp-48_w=00000000
8: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -56) = r2        ; R2_w=P0 R10=fp0 fp-56_w=00000000
9: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -64) = r2        ; R2_w=P0 R10=fp0 fp-64_w=00000000
; bpf_ima_file_hash(bprm->file, buf, sizeof(buf));
10: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +64)        ; R1_w=ptr_file(off=0,imm=0)
11: (bf) r2 = r10                     ; R2_w=fp0 R10=fp0
; 
12: (07) r2 += -64                    ; R2_w=fp-64
; bpf_ima_file_hash(bprm->file, buf, sizeof(buf));
13: (b4) w3 = 64                      ; R3_w=64
14: (85) call bpf_ima_file_hash#193
last_idx 14 first_idx 0
regs=8 stack=0 before 13: (b4) w3 = 64
15: R0_w=scalar() fp-8_w=mmmmmmmm fp-16_w=mmmmmmmm fp-24_w=mmmmmmmm fp-32_w=mmmmmmmm fp-40_w=mmmmmmmm fp-48_w=mmmmmmmm fp-56_w=mmmmmmmm fp-64_w=mmmmmmmm
; int BPF_PROG(dbg, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
15: (b4) w0 = 0                       ; R0_w=0
16: (95) exit

I use the following revision: 830b3c68c1fb "Linux 6.1".
(also works with current bpf-next master).

Could you please provide some details on how you compile/load the program?

Thanks,
Eduard

[...]




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux