The condition src_reg != BPF_PSEUDO_CALL && imm == BPF_FUNC_tail_call may be satisfied by a kfunc call. This would lead to unnecessarily setting has_tail_call. Use src_reg == BPF_HELPER_CALL instead. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 427525fc3791..71158a6786a1 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2475,8 +2475,8 @@ static int check_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) u8 code = insn[i].code; if (code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL) && - insn[i].imm == BPF_FUNC_tail_call && - insn[i].src_reg != BPF_PSEUDO_CALL) + insn[i].src_reg == BPF_HELPER_CALL && + insn[i].imm == BPF_FUNC_tail_call) subprog[cur_subprog].has_tail_call = true; if (BPF_CLASS(code) == BPF_LD && (BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_ABS || BPF_MODE(code) == BPF_IND)) -- 2.39.1
