Re: [PATCH 1/2] LoongArch: BPF: Treat function address as 64-bit value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Hengqi,

On 02/12/2023 11:52 AM, Hengqi Chen wrote:
Let's always use 4 instructions for function address in JIT.
So that the instruction sequences don't change between the first
pass and the extra pass for function calls.

Fixes: 5dc615520c4d ("LoongArch: Add BPF JIT support")
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
index c4b1947ebf76..2d952110be72 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c
@@ -446,6 +446,27 @@ static int add_exception_handler(const struct bpf_insn *insn,
 	return 0;
 }

+static inline void emit_addr_move(struct jit_ctx *ctx, enum loongarch_gpr rd, u64 addr)
+{
+	u64 imm_11_0, imm_31_12, imm_51_32, imm_63_52;
+
+	/* lu12iw rd, imm_31_12 */
+	imm_31_12 = (addr >> 12) & 0xfffff;
+	emit_insn(ctx, lu12iw, rd, imm_31_12);
+
+	/* ori rd, rd, imm_11_0 */
+	imm_11_0 = addr & 0xfff;
+	emit_insn(ctx, ori, rd, rd, imm_11_0);
+
+	/* lu32id rd, imm_51_32 */
+	imm_51_32 = (addr >> 32) & 0xfffff;
+	emit_insn(ctx, lu32id, rd, imm_51_32);
+
+	/* lu52id rd, rd, imm_63_52 */
+	imm_63_52 = (addr >> 52) & 0xfff;
+	emit_insn(ctx, lu52id, rd, rd, imm_63_52);
+}
+
 static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool extra_pass)
 {
 	u8 tm = -1;
@@ -841,7 +862,7 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx, bool ext
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;

-		move_imm(ctx, t1, func_addr, is32);
+		emit_addr_move(ctx, t1, func_addr);
 		emit_insn(ctx, jirl, t1, LOONGARCH_GPR_RA, 0);
 		move_reg(ctx, regmap[BPF_REG_0], LOONGARCH_GPR_A0);
 		break;


The code itself looks good to me.

Could you please give more detailed info in the commit message?
For example, description of problem, steps to reproduce, ...
I think the descriptions in the cover letter are useful, it is
better to record them in the commit message.

Additionally, emit_addr_move() is similar with move_imm(), it is
better to define emit_addr_move() before move_imm() in bpf_jit.h.

Thanks,
Tiezhu




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux