Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/9] selftests/bpf: Forward SAN_CFLAGS and SAN_LDFLAGS to runqslower and libbpf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 1:55 AM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 17:03 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:57 PM Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > To get useful results from the Memory Sanitizer, all code running
> > > in a
> > > process needs to be instrumented. When building tests with other
> > > sanitizers, it's not strictly necessary, but is also helpful.
> > > So make sure runqslower and libbpf are compiled with SAN_CFLAGS and
> > > linked with SAN_LDFLAGS.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 7 +++++--
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> > > b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> > > index 9b5786ac676e..c4b5c44cdee2 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> > > @@ -215,7 +215,9 @@ $(OUTPUT)/runqslower: $(BPFOBJ) |
> > > $(DEFAULT_BPFTOOL) $(RUNQSLOWER_OUTPUT)
> > >                     OUTPUT=$(RUNQSLOWER_OUTPUT)
> > > VMLINUX_BTF=$(VMLINUX_BTF)     \
> > >
> > > BPFTOOL_OUTPUT=$(HOST_BUILD_DIR)/bpftool/                  \
> > >
> > > BPFOBJ_OUTPUT=$(BUILD_DIR)/libbpf                          \
> > > -                   BPFOBJ=$(BPFOBJ) BPF_INCLUDE=$(INCLUDE_DIR)
> > > &&             \
> > > +                   BPFOBJ=$(BPFOBJ)
> > > BPF_INCLUDE=$(INCLUDE_DIR)                \
> > > +                   EXTRA_CFLAGS='-g -O0
> > > $(SAN_CFLAGS)'                        \
> > > +                   EXTRA_LDFLAGS='$(SAN_LDFLAGS)'
> > > &&                          \
> > >                     cp $(RUNQSLOWER_OUTPUT)runqslower $@
> > >
> >
> > I wouldn't do it for runqslower, we just make sure that it compiles,
> > we don't really run it at all. No need to complicate its build, IMO.
>
> runqslower is linked with target libbpf, which is instrumented.
> This produces undefined symbol errors, since MSan runtime is expected
> to be a part of an executable.

ah, ok then, never mind

>
> [...]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux