David Vernet wrote: > > +Reserved instructions > > +==================== > > small nit: Missing a = Ack. > > +Clang will generate the reserved ``BPF_CALL | BPF_X | BPF_JMP`` (0x8d) > instruction if ``-O0`` is used. > > Are we calling this out here to say that BPF_CALL in clang -O0 builds is not > supported? That would seem to be the case given that we say that BPF_CALL > | BPF_X | BPF_JMP in reserved and not permitted in instruction-set.rst. Yes, exactly. I could update the language to add something like "... so BPF_CALL in clang -O0 builds is not supported". Dave
