On 02/02/2023 07:26 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 4:36 AM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The intention of this patchset is to make the code more readable,
no functional changes, based on bpf-next.
If this patchset makes no sense, please ignore it and sorry for that.
...
157 files changed, 4299 insertions(+), 4295 deletions(-)
Are you trying to get to the top of lwn's "most active developers by
lines changed" ?
Oh, no, no intention of doing so.
I'm sure you knew that it's most likely going to be rejected,
yet you still sent it. why?
Sorry for the trouble.
Maybe just send patch #1 and #4 as RFC is a proper way.
Your developer's reputation suffers.
Think quality and not quantity.
Anyway, thank you for your reply.
