Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] bpf: Replace BPF_ALU and BPF_JMP with BPF_ALU32 and BPF_JMP64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 02/02/2023 07:26 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 4:36 AM Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The intention of this patchset is to make the code more readable,
no functional changes, based on bpf-next.

If this patchset makes no sense, please ignore it and sorry for that.
...
 157 files changed, 4299 insertions(+), 4295 deletions(-)

Are you trying to get to the top of lwn's "most active developers by
lines changed" ?

Oh, no, no intention of doing so.

I'm sure you knew that it's most likely going to be rejected,
yet you still sent it. why?

Sorry for the trouble.
Maybe just send patch #1 and #4 as RFC is a proper way.

Your developer's reputation suffers.
Think quality and not quantity.


Anyway, thank you for your reply.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux