On 01/02/2023 18.46, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
On 2/1/23 9:31 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
index 3823b1c499cc..438083e34cce 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static void close_xsk(struct xsk *xsk)
xsk_umem__delete(xsk->umem);
if (xsk->socket)
xsk_socket__delete(xsk->socket);
- munmap(xsk->umem, UMEM_SIZE);
+ munmap(xsk->umem_area, UMEM_SIZE);
Ah. Good catch. This should also explain a similar issue that CI is
seeing in the prog_tests/xdp_metadata.c.
Yes, very likely same bug in prog_tests/xdp_metadata.c.
It was super tricky (and time consuming) to find as I was debugging in
GDB and it didn't make sense that checking a value against NULL would
cause a segfault. Plus, sometimes it worked without issues.
We also need this fix:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_metadata.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_metadata.c
index e033d48288c0..241909d71c7e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_metadata.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_metadata.c
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static void close_xsk(struct xsk *xsk)
xsk_umem__delete(xsk->umem);
if (xsk->socket)
xsk_socket__delete(xsk->socket);
- munmap(xsk->umem, UMEM_SIZE);
+ munmap(xsk->umem_area, UMEM_SIZE);
}