Re: [PATCH v9 bpf-next 3/5] bpf: Add skb dynptrs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/27/23 11:17 AM, Joanne Koong wrote:
@@ -8243,6 +8316,28 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
  		mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, BPF_REG_0);
  		regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_MEM | ret_flag;
  		regs[BPF_REG_0].mem_size = meta.mem_size;
+		if (func_id == BPF_FUNC_dynptr_data &&
+		    dynptr_type == BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_SKB) {
+			bool seen_direct_write = env->seen_direct_write;
+
+			regs[BPF_REG_0].type |= DYNPTR_TYPE_SKB;
+			if (!may_access_direct_pkt_data(env, NULL, BPF_WRITE))
+				regs[BPF_REG_0].type |= MEM_RDONLY;
+			else
+				/*
+				 * Calling may_access_direct_pkt_data() will set
+				 * env->seen_direct_write to true if the skb is
+				 * writable. As an optimization, we can ignore
+				 * setting env->seen_direct_write.
+				 *
+				 * env->seen_direct_write is used by skb
+				 * programs to determine whether the skb's page
+				 * buffers should be cloned. Since data slice
+				 * writes would only be to the head, we can skip
+				 * this.
+				 */
+				env->seen_direct_write = seen_direct_write;
+		}

[ ... ]

@@ -9263,17 +9361,26 @@ static int check_kfunc_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_kfunc_call_
  				return ret;
  			break;
  		case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR:
+		{
+			enum bpf_arg_type dynptr_arg_type = ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR;
+
  			if (reg->type != PTR_TO_STACK &&
  			    reg->type != CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR) {
  				verbose(env, "arg#%d expected pointer to stack or dynptr_ptr\n", i);
  				return -EINVAL;
  			}
- ret = process_dynptr_func(env, regno, insn_idx,
-						  ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | MEM_RDONLY);
+			if (meta->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_dynptr_from_skb])
+				dynptr_arg_type |= MEM_UNINIT | DYNPTR_TYPE_SKB;
+			else
+				dynptr_arg_type |= MEM_RDONLY;
+
+			ret = process_dynptr_func(env, regno, insn_idx, dynptr_arg_type,
+						  meta->func_id);
  			if (ret < 0)
  				return ret;
  			break;
+		}
  		case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_LIST_HEAD:
  			if (reg->type != PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE &&
  			    reg->type != (PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_ALLOC)) {
@@ -15857,6 +15964,14 @@ static int fixup_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
  		   desc->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_rdonly_cast]) {
  		insn_buf[0] = BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1);
  		*cnt = 1;
+	} else if (desc->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_dynptr_from_skb]) {
+		bool is_rdonly = !may_access_direct_pkt_data(env, NULL, BPF_WRITE);

Does it need to restore the env->seen_direct_write here also?

It seems this 'seen_direct_write' saving/restoring is needed now because 'may_access_direct_pkt_data(BPF_WRITE)' is not only called when it is actually writing the packet. Some refactoring can help to avoid issue like this.

While at 'seen_direct_write', Alexei has also pointed out that the verifier needs to track whether the (packet) 'slice' returned by bpf_dynptr_data() has been written. It should be tracked in 'seen_direct_write'. Take a look at how reg_is_pkt_pointer() and may_access_direct_pkt_data() are done in check_mem_access(). iirc, this reg_is_pkt_pointer() part got loss somewhere in v5 (or v4?) when bpf_dynptr_data() was changed to return register typed PTR_TO_MEM instead of PTR_TO_PACKET.


[ ... ]

+int bpf_dynptr_from_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, u64 flags,
+			struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr, int is_rdonly)

hmm... this exposed kfunc takes "int is_rdonly".

What if the bpf prog calls it like bpf_dynptr_from_skb(..., false) in some hook that is not writable to packet?

+{
+	if (flags) {
+		bpf_dynptr_set_null(ptr);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	bpf_dynptr_init(ptr, skb, BPF_DYNPTR_TYPE_SKB, 0, skb->len);
+
+	if (is_rdonly)
+		bpf_dynptr_set_rdonly(ptr);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
  BPF_CALL_1(bpf_sk_fullsock, struct sock *, sk)
  {
  	return sk_fullsock(sk) ? (unsigned long)sk : (unsigned long)NULL;
@@ -11607,3 +11634,28 @@ bpf_sk_base_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
return func;
  }
+
+BTF_SET8_START(bpf_kfunc_check_set_skb)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_from_skb)
+BTF_SET8_END(bpf_kfunc_check_set_skb)
+
+static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_skb = {
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	.set = &bpf_kfunc_check_set_skb,
+};
+
+static int __init bpf_kfunc_init(void)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
+	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
+	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
+	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
+	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
+	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
+	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
+	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
+	return ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_SEG6LOCAL, &bpf_kfunc_set_skb);
+}
+late_initcall(bpf_kfunc_init);





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux