Re: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] bpf/selftests: Verify struct_ops prog sleepable behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 09:32:03PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 3:22 PM David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > +static struct dummy_st_ops *open_load_skel(void)
> > +{
> > +       int err;
> > +       struct dummy_st_ops *skel;
> > +
> > +       skel = dummy_st_ops__open();
> > +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "dummy_st_ops_open"))
> > +               return NULL;
> > +
> > +       err = bpf_program__set_flags(skel->progs.test_3, BPF_F_SLEEPABLE);
> 
> Feels that this is incomplete without libbpf support.
> Instead of:
> +SEC("struct_ops/test_3")
> the users should be able to:
> +SEC("struct_ops.s/test_3")
> 
> and the above manual set_flags won't be needed.

Thanks for the pointer, agreed that's far better (and matches existing
behavior for other prog types). Will address this in v2.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux