David Vernet <void@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I was perhaps a bit naive to think we could just throw a __bpf_kfunc > macro onto the function signatures and call it a day :-) I think it's > probably best to table this for now, and either I or someone else can > come back to it when we have bandwidth to solve the problem more > appropriately. Now I feel bad ... I was just tossing out a thought, not wanting to bikeshed this work into oblivion. If what you have solves a real problem and is the best that can be done now, perhaps it should just go in and a "more appropriate" solution can be adopted later, should somebody manage to come up with it? Thanks, jon
