Extends test_loader.c:test_loader__run_subtests() by allowing to
execute tests in unprivileged mode, similar to test_verifier.c.
Adds the following new attributes controlling test_loader behavior:
__msg_unpriv
__success_unpriv
__failure_unpriv
* If any of these attributes is present the test would be loaded in
unprivileged mode.
* If only "privileged" attributes are present the test would be loaded
only in privileged mode.
* If both "privileged" and "unprivileged" attributes are present the
test would be loaded in both modes.
* If test has to be executed in both modes, __msg(text) is specified
and __msg_unpriv is not specified the behavior is the same as if
__msg_unpriv(text) is specified.
* For test filtering purposes the name of the program loaded in
unprivileged mode is derived from the usual program name by adding
`@unpriv' suffix.
Also adds attribute '__description'. This attribute specifies text to
be used instead of a program name for display and filtering purposes.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 7 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/autoconf_helper.h | 9 +
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h | 48 +++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c | 337 ++++++++++++++----
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 25 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.c | 26 ++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.h | 7 +
7 files changed, 359 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/autoconf_helper.h
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.c
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.h
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index 22533a18705e..26e66f9a0977 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -218,8 +218,9 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED += $(DEFAULT_BPFTOOL)
$(TEST_GEN_PROGS) $(TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED): $(BPFOBJ)
-CGROUP_HELPERS := $(OUTPUT)/cgroup_helpers.o
TESTING_HELPERS := $(OUTPUT)/testing_helpers.o
+CGROUP_HELPERS := $(OUTPUT)/cgroup_helpers.o
+UNPRIV_HELPERS := $(OUTPUT)/unpriv_helpers.o
TRACE_HELPERS := $(OUTPUT)/trace_helpers.o
CAP_HELPERS := $(OUTPUT)/cap_helpers.o
@@ -238,7 +239,7 @@ $(OUTPUT)/test_lirc_mode2_user: $(TESTING_HELPERS)
$(OUTPUT)/xdping: $(TESTING_HELPERS)
$(OUTPUT)/flow_dissector_load: $(TESTING_HELPERS)
$(OUTPUT)/test_maps: $(TESTING_HELPERS)
-$(OUTPUT)/test_verifier: $(TESTING_HELPERS) $(CAP_HELPERS)
+$(OUTPUT)/test_verifier: $(TESTING_HELPERS) $(CAP_HELPERS) $(UNPRIV_HELPERS)
$(OUTPUT)/xsk.o: $(BPFOBJ)
BPFTOOL ?= $(DEFAULT_BPFTOOL)
@@ -527,7 +528,7 @@ TRUNNER_BPF_PROGS_DIR := progs
TRUNNER_EXTRA_SOURCES := test_progs.c cgroup_helpers.c trace_helpers.c \
network_helpers.c testing_helpers.c \
btf_helpers.c flow_dissector_load.h \
- cap_helpers.c test_loader.c
+ cap_helpers.c test_loader.c unpriv_helpers.c
TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES := $(OUTPUT)/urandom_read $(OUTPUT)/bpf_testmod.ko \
$(OUTPUT)/liburandom_read.so \
$(OUTPUT)/xdp_synproxy \
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/autoconf_helper.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/autoconf_helper.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5b243b9cdf8c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/autoconf_helper.h
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+
+#ifdef HAVE_GENHDR
+# include "autoconf.h"
+#else
+# if defined(__i386) || defined(__x86_64) || defined(__s390x__) || defined(__aarch64__)
+# define CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS 1
+# endif
+#endif
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
index 2d7b89b447b2..e742a935de98 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h
@@ -2,10 +2,58 @@
#ifndef __BPF_MISC_H__
#define __BPF_MISC_H__
+/* This set of attributes controls behavior of the
+ * test_loader.c:test_loader__run_subtests().
+ *
+ * The test_loader sequentially loads each program in a skeleton.
+ * Programs could be loaded in privileged and unprivileged modes.
+ * - __success, __failure, __msg imply privileged mode;
+ * - __success_unpriv, __failure_unpriv, __msg_unpriv imply
+ * unprivileged mode.
+ * If combination of privileged and unprivileged attributes is present
+ * both modes are used. If none are present privileged mode is implied.
+ *
+ * See test_loader.c:set_admin() for exact set of capabilities that
+ * differ between privileged and unprivileged modes.
+ *
+ * For test filtering purposes the name of the program loaded in
+ * unprivileged mode is derived from the usual program name by adding
+ * `@unpriv' suffix.
+ *
+ * __msg Message expected to be found in the verifier log.
+ * Multiple __msg attributes could be specified.
+ * __msg_unpriv Same as __msg but for unprivileged mode.
+ *
+ * __success Expect program load success in privileged mode.
+ * __success_unpriv Expect program load success in unprivileged mode.
+ *
+ * __failure Expect program load failure in privileged mode.
+ * __failure_unpriv Expect program load failure in unprivileged mode.
+ *
+ * __description Text to be used instead of a program name for display
+ * and filtering purposes.
+ *
+ * __log_level Log level to use for the program, numeric value expected.
+ *
+ * __flag Adds one flag use for the program, the following values are valid:
+ * - BPF_F_STRICT_ALIGNMENT;
+ * - BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32;
+ * - BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ;
+ * - BPF_F_SLEEPABLE;
+ * - BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS;
+ * - A numeric value.
+ * Multiple __flag attributes could be specified, the final flags
+ * value is derived by applying binary "or" to all specified values.
+ */
#define __msg(msg) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_msg=" msg)))
#define __failure __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_failure")))
#define __success __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_success")))
+#define __description(desc) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_description=" desc)))
+#define __msg_unpriv(msg) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_msg_unpriv=" msg)))
+#define __failure_unpriv __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_failure_unpriv")))
+#define __success_unpriv __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_expect_success_unpriv")))
#define __log_level(lvl) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_log_level="#lvl)))
+#define __flag(flag) __attribute__((btf_decl_tag("comment:test_prog_flags="#flag)))
/* Convenience macro for use with 'asm volatile' blocks */
#define __naked __attribute__((naked))
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
index bf41390157bf..f035f08c413c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_loader.c
@@ -1,9 +1,14 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/* Copyright (c) 2022 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <test_progs.h>
#include <bpf/btf.h>
+#include "autoconf_helper.h"
+#include "unpriv_helpers.h"
+#include "cap_helpers.h"
+
#define str_has_pfx(str, pfx) \
(strncmp(str, pfx, __builtin_constant_p(pfx) ? sizeof(pfx) - 1 : strlen(pfx)) == 0)
@@ -12,16 +17,38 @@
#define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_FAILURE "comment:test_expect_failure"
#define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_SUCCESS "comment:test_expect_success"
#define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX "comment:test_expect_msg="
+#define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_FAILURE_UNPRIV "comment:test_expect_failure_unpriv"
+#define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_SUCCESS_UNPRIV "comment:test_expect_success_unpriv"
+#define TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX_UNPRIV "comment:test_expect_msg_unpriv="
#define TEST_TAG_LOG_LEVEL_PFX "comment:test_log_level="
#define TEST_TAG_PROG_FLAGS_PFX "comment:test_prog_flags="
+#define TEST_TAG_DESCRIPTION_PFX "comment:test_description="
-struct test_spec {
- const char *name;
+#define ADMIN_CAPS (1ULL << CAP_SYS_ADMIN | \
+ 1ULL << CAP_PERFMON | \
+ 1ULL << CAP_BPF)
+
+static int sysctl_unpriv_disabled = -1;
+
+enum mode {
+ PRIV = 1,
+ UNPRIV = 2
+};
+
+struct test_subspec {
+ char *name;
bool expect_failure;
const char **expect_msgs;
size_t expect_msg_cnt;
+};
+
+struct test_spec {
+ const char *prog_name;
+ struct test_subspec priv;
+ struct test_subspec unpriv;
int log_level;
int prog_flags;
+ int mode_mask;
};
static int tester_init(struct test_loader *tester)
@@ -44,17 +71,46 @@ void test_loader_fini(struct test_loader *tester)
free(tester->log_buf);
}
+static void free_test_spec(struct test_spec *spec)
+{
+ free(spec->priv.name);
+ free(spec->unpriv.name);
+ free(spec->priv.expect_msgs);
+ free(spec->unpriv.expect_msgs);
+}
+
+static int push_msg(const char *msg, struct test_subspec *subspec)
+{
+ void *tmp;
+
+ tmp = realloc(subspec->expect_msgs, (1 + subspec->expect_msg_cnt) * sizeof(void *));
+ if (!tmp) {
+ ASSERT_FAIL("failed to realloc memory for messages\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ subspec->expect_msgs = tmp;
+ subspec->expect_msgs[subspec->expect_msg_cnt++] = msg;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Uses btf_decl_tag attributes to describe the expected test
+ * behavior, see bpf_misc.h for detailed description of each attribute
+ * and attribute combinations.
+ */
static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester,
struct bpf_object *obj,
struct bpf_program *prog,
struct test_spec *spec)
{
+ const char *description = NULL;
+ bool has_unpriv_result = false;
+ int func_id, i, err = 0;
struct btf *btf;
- int func_id, i;
memset(spec, 0, sizeof(*spec));
- spec->name = bpf_program__name(prog);
+ spec->prog_name = bpf_program__name(prog);
btf = bpf_object__btf(obj);
if (!btf) {
@@ -62,15 +118,15 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester,
return -EINVAL;
}
- func_id = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, spec->name, BTF_KIND_FUNC);
+ func_id = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, spec->prog_name, BTF_KIND_FUNC);
if (func_id < 0) {
- ASSERT_FAIL("failed to find FUNC BTF type for '%s'", spec->name);
+ ASSERT_FAIL("failed to find FUNC BTF type for '%s'", spec->prog_name);
return -EINVAL;
}
for (i = 1; i < btf__type_cnt(btf); i++) {
+ const char *s, *val, *msg;
const struct btf_type *t;
- const char *s, *val;
char *e;
t = btf__type_by_id(btf, i);
@@ -81,30 +137,42 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester,
continue;
s = btf__str_by_offset(btf, t->name_off);
- if (strcmp(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_FAILURE) == 0) {
- spec->expect_failure = true;
+ if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_DESCRIPTION_PFX)) {
+ description = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_DESCRIPTION_PFX) - 1;
+ } else if (strcmp(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_FAILURE) == 0) {
+ spec->priv.expect_failure = true;
+ spec->mode_mask |= PRIV;
} else if (strcmp(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_SUCCESS) == 0) {
- spec->expect_failure = false;
+ spec->priv.expect_failure = false;
+ spec->mode_mask |= PRIV;
+ } else if (strcmp(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_FAILURE_UNPRIV) == 0) {
+ spec->unpriv.expect_failure = true;
+ spec->mode_mask |= UNPRIV;
+ has_unpriv_result = true;
+ } else if (strcmp(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_SUCCESS_UNPRIV) == 0) {
+ spec->unpriv.expect_failure = false;
+ spec->mode_mask |= UNPRIV;
+ has_unpriv_result = true;
} else if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX)) {
- void *tmp;
- const char **msg;
-
- tmp = realloc(spec->expect_msgs,
- (1 + spec->expect_msg_cnt) * sizeof(void *));
- if (!tmp) {
- ASSERT_FAIL("failed to realloc memory for messages\n");
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
- spec->expect_msgs = tmp;
- msg = &spec->expect_msgs[spec->expect_msg_cnt++];
- *msg = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX) - 1;
+ msg = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX) - 1;
+ err = push_msg(msg, &spec->priv);
+ if (err)
+ goto cleanup;
+ spec->mode_mask |= PRIV;
+ } else if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX_UNPRIV)) {
+ msg = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_EXPECT_MSG_PFX_UNPRIV) - 1;
+ err = push_msg(msg, &spec->unpriv);
+ if (err)
+ goto cleanup;
+ spec->mode_mask |= UNPRIV;
} else if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_LOG_LEVEL_PFX)) {
val = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_LOG_LEVEL_PFX) - 1;
errno = 0;
spec->log_level = strtol(val, &e, 0);
if (errno || e[0] != '\0') {
- ASSERT_FAIL("failed to parse test log level from '%s'", s);
- return -EINVAL;
+ PRINT_FAIL("failed to parse test log level from '%s'\n", s);
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto cleanup;
}
} else if (str_has_pfx(s, TEST_TAG_PROG_FLAGS_PFX)) {
val = s + sizeof(TEST_TAG_PROG_FLAGS_PFX) - 1;
@@ -124,14 +192,70 @@ static int parse_test_spec(struct test_loader *tester,
errno = 0;
spec->prog_flags |= strtol(val, &e, 0);
if (errno || e[0] != '\0') {
- ASSERT_FAIL("failed to parse test prog flags from '%s'", s);
- return -EINVAL;
+ PRINT_FAIL("failed to parse test prog flags from '%s'\n",
+ val);
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto cleanup;
}
}
}
}
+ if (spec->mode_mask == 0)
+ spec->mode_mask = PRIV;
+
+ if (!description)
+ description = spec->prog_name;
+
+ if (spec->mode_mask & PRIV) {
+ spec->priv.name = strdup(description);
+ if (!spec->priv.name) {
+ PRINT_FAIL("failed to allocate memory for priv.name\n");
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (spec->mode_mask & UNPRIV) {
+ int descr_len = strlen(description);
+ const char *suffix = " @unpriv";
+ char *name;
+
+ name = malloc(descr_len + strlen(suffix) + 1);
+ if (!name) {
+ PRINT_FAIL("failed to allocate memory for unpriv.name\n");
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+
+ strcpy(name, description);
+ strcpy(&name[descr_len], suffix);
+ spec->unpriv.name = name;
+ }
+
+ if (spec->mode_mask & (PRIV | UNPRIV)) {
+ if (!has_unpriv_result)
+ spec->unpriv.expect_failure = spec->priv.expect_failure;
+
+ if (!spec->unpriv.expect_msgs) {
+ size_t sz = spec->priv.expect_msg_cnt * sizeof(void *);
+
+ spec->unpriv.expect_msgs = malloc(sz);
+ if (!spec->unpriv.expect_msgs) {
+ PRINT_FAIL("failed to allocate memory for unpriv.expect_msgs\n");
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto cleanup;
+ }
+ memcpy(spec->unpriv.expect_msgs, spec->priv.expect_msgs, sz);
+ spec->unpriv.expect_msg_cnt = spec->priv.expect_msg_cnt;
+ }
+ }
+
return 0;
+
+cleanup:
+ free_test_spec(spec);
+ return err;
}
static void prepare_case(struct test_loader *tester,
@@ -148,7 +272,7 @@ static void prepare_case(struct test_loader *tester,
bpf_program__set_log_buf(prog, tester->log_buf, tester->log_buf_sz);
- /* Make sure we set at least minimal log level, unless test requirest
+ /* Make sure we set at least minimal log level, unless test requires
* even higher level already. Make sure to preserve independent log
* level 4 (verifier stats), though.
*/
@@ -172,18 +296,18 @@ static void emit_verifier_log(const char *log_buf, bool force)
}
static void validate_case(struct test_loader *tester,
- struct test_spec *spec,
+ struct test_subspec *subspec,
struct bpf_object *obj,
struct bpf_program *prog,
int load_err)
{
int i, j;
- for (i = 0; i < spec->expect_msg_cnt; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < subspec->expect_msg_cnt; i++) {
char *match;
const char *expect_msg;
- expect_msg = spec->expect_msgs[i];
+ expect_msg = subspec->expect_msgs[i];
match = strstr(tester->log_buf + tester->next_match_pos, expect_msg);
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(match, "expect_msg")) {
@@ -191,7 +315,8 @@ static void validate_case(struct test_loader *tester,
if (env.verbosity == VERBOSE_NONE)
emit_verifier_log(tester->log_buf, true /*force*/);
for (j = 0; j < i; j++)
- fprintf(stderr, "MATCHED MSG: '%s'\n", spec->expect_msgs[j]);
+ fprintf(stderr,
+ "MATCHED MSG: '%s'\n", subspec->expect_msgs[j]);
fprintf(stderr, "EXPECTED MSG: '%s'\n", expect_msg);
return;
}
@@ -200,17 +325,114 @@ static void validate_case(struct test_loader *tester,
}
}
+static int set_admin(bool admin)
+{
+ int err;
+
+ if (admin)
+ err = cap_enable_effective(ADMIN_CAPS, NULL);
+ else
+ err = cap_disable_effective(ADMIN_CAPS, NULL);
+
+ if (err)
+ PRINT_FAIL("%s admin privs failed: %i, %s\n",
+ admin ? "gain" : "drop", err, strerror(err));
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+static bool can_execute_unpriv(struct test_loader *tester, struct test_spec *spec)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
+ bool efficient_unaligned_access = true;
+#else
+ bool efficient_unaligned_access = false;
+#endif
+ if (sysctl_unpriv_disabled < 0)
+ sysctl_unpriv_disabled = get_unpriv_disabled() ? 1 : 0;
+ if (sysctl_unpriv_disabled)
+ return false;
+ if ((spec->prog_flags & BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT) && !efficient_unaligned_access)
+ return false;
+ return true;
+}
+
/* this function is forced noinline and has short generic name to look better
* in test_progs output (in case of a failure)
*/
static noinline
void run_subtest(struct test_loader *tester,
- const char *skel_name,
- skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_factory)
+ struct bpf_object_open_opts *open_opts,
+ const void *obj_bytes,
+ size_t obj_byte_cnt,
+ struct test_spec *spec,
+ bool unpriv)
+{
+ struct test_subspec *subspec = unpriv ? &spec->unpriv : &spec->priv;
+ struct bpf_program *tprog;
+ struct bpf_object *tobj;
+ int err;
+
+ if (!test__start_subtest(subspec->name))
+ return;
+
+ if (unpriv && !can_execute_unpriv(tester, spec)) {
+ test__skip();
+ test__end_subtest();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ if (unpriv)
+ set_admin(false);
+
+ tobj = bpf_object__open_mem(obj_bytes, obj_byte_cnt, open_opts);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(tobj, "obj_open_mem")) /* shouldn't happen */
+ goto subtest_cleanup;
+
+ bpf_object__for_each_program(tprog, tobj)
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(tprog, false);
+
+ bpf_object__for_each_program(tprog, tobj) {
+ /* only load specified program */
+ if (strcmp(bpf_program__name(tprog), spec->prog_name) == 0) {
+ bpf_program__set_autoload(tprog, true);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ prepare_case(tester, spec, tobj, tprog);
+
+ err = bpf_object__load(tobj);
+ if (subspec->expect_failure) {
+ if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "unexpected_load_success")) {
+ emit_verifier_log(tester->log_buf, false /*force*/);
+ goto tobj_cleanup;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "unexpected_load_failure")) {
+ emit_verifier_log(tester->log_buf, true /*force*/);
+ goto tobj_cleanup;
+ }
+ }
+
+ emit_verifier_log(tester->log_buf, false /*force*/);
+ validate_case(tester, subspec, tobj, tprog, err);
+
+tobj_cleanup:
+ bpf_object__close(tobj);
+subtest_cleanup:
+ test__end_subtest();
+ if (unpriv)
+ set_admin(true);
+}
+
+static void process_subtest(struct test_loader *tester,
+ const char *skel_name,
+ skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_factory)
{
LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, open_opts, .object_name = skel_name);
- struct bpf_object *obj = NULL, *tobj;
- struct bpf_program *prog, *tprog;
+ struct bpf_object *obj = NULL;
+ struct bpf_program *prog;
const void *obj_bytes;
size_t obj_byte_cnt;
int err;
@@ -224,52 +446,19 @@ void run_subtest(struct test_loader *tester,
return;
bpf_object__for_each_program(prog, obj) {
- const char *prog_name = bpf_program__name(prog);
struct test_spec spec;
- if (!test__start_subtest(prog_name))
- continue;
-
/* if we can't derive test specification, go to the next test */
err = parse_test_spec(tester, obj, prog, &spec);
if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "parse_test_spec"))
continue;
- tobj = bpf_object__open_mem(obj_bytes, obj_byte_cnt, &open_opts);
- if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(tobj, "obj_open_mem")) /* shouldn't happen */
- continue;
+ if (spec.mode_mask & PRIV)
+ run_subtest(tester, &open_opts, obj_bytes, obj_byte_cnt, &spec, false);
+ if (spec.mode_mask & UNPRIV)
+ run_subtest(tester, &open_opts, obj_bytes, obj_byte_cnt, &spec, true);
- bpf_object__for_each_program(tprog, tobj)
- bpf_program__set_autoload(tprog, false);
-
- bpf_object__for_each_program(tprog, tobj) {
- /* only load specified program */
- if (strcmp(bpf_program__name(tprog), prog_name) == 0) {
- bpf_program__set_autoload(tprog, true);
- break;
- }
- }
-
- prepare_case(tester, &spec, tobj, tprog);
-
- err = bpf_object__load(tobj);
- if (spec.expect_failure) {
- if (!ASSERT_ERR(err, "unexpected_load_success")) {
- emit_verifier_log(tester->log_buf, false /*force*/);
- goto tobj_cleanup;
- }
- } else {
- if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "unexpected_load_failure")) {
- emit_verifier_log(tester->log_buf, true /*force*/);
- goto tobj_cleanup;
- }
- }
-
- emit_verifier_log(tester->log_buf, false /*force*/);
- validate_case(tester, &spec, tobj, tprog, err);
-
-tobj_cleanup:
- bpf_object__close(tobj);
+ free_test_spec(&spec);
}
bpf_object__close(obj);
@@ -280,5 +469,5 @@ void test_loader__run_subtests(struct test_loader *tester,
skel_elf_bytes_fn elf_bytes_factory)
{
/* see comment in run_subtest() for why we do this function nesting */
- run_subtest(tester, skel_name, elf_bytes_factory);
+ process_subtest(tester, skel_name, elf_bytes_factory);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 8c808551dfd7..6071dff9c8a1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -33,13 +33,8 @@
#include <bpf/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
-#ifdef HAVE_GENHDR
-# include "autoconf.h"
-#else
-# if defined(__i386) || defined(__x86_64) || defined(__s390x__) || defined(__aarch64__)
-# define CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS 1
-# endif
-#endif
+#include "autoconf_helper.h"
+#include "unpriv_helpers.h"
#include "cap_helpers.h"
#include "bpf_rand.h"
#include "bpf_util.h"
@@ -1665,22 +1660,6 @@ static bool is_admin(void)
return (caps & ADMIN_CAPS) == ADMIN_CAPS;
}
-static void get_unpriv_disabled()
-{
- char buf[2];
- FILE *fd;
-
- fd = fopen("/proc/sys/"UNPRIV_SYSCTL, "r");
- if (!fd) {
- perror("fopen /proc/sys/"UNPRIV_SYSCTL);
- unpriv_disabled = true;
- return;
- }
- if (fgets(buf, 2, fd) == buf && atoi(buf))
- unpriv_disabled = true;
- fclose(fd);
-}
-
static bool test_as_unpriv(struct bpf_test *test)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..488371edb3e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.c
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+
+#include <stdbool.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <error.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+#include "unpriv_helpers.h"
+
+bool get_unpriv_disabled(void)
+{
+ bool disabled;
+ char buf[2];
+ FILE *fd;
+
+ fd = fopen("/proc/sys/"UNPRIV_SYSCTL, "r");
+ if (fd) {
+ disabled = (fgets(buf, 2, fd) == buf && atoi(buf));
+ fclose(fd);
+ } else {
+ perror("fopen /proc/sys/"UNPRIV_SYSCTL);
+ disabled = true;
+ }
+
+ return disabled;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..151f67329665
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/unpriv_helpers.h
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+
+#include <stdbool.h>
+
+#define UNPRIV_SYSCTL "kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled"
+
+bool get_unpriv_disabled(void);
--
2.39.0
