Re: pahole: New version 1.25 release?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 8:15 PM Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/20/23 9:40 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > Hi Arnaldo,
> >
> > I use CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y with LLVM-15.
> >
> > Darkly, I remember I needed some post-v1.24 fixes.
> >
> > Currently, I use:
> >
> > $ git describe
> > v1.24-26-gb72f5188856d
> >
> > commit b72f5188856d
> > "dwarves: Zero-initialize struct cu in cu__new() to prevent incorrect BTF types"
> >
> > Any plans to release a pahole version 1.25?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > -Sedat-
> >
> > P.S.: I still carry this diff around (attached as diff as Gmail might
> > truncate the following lines):
> >
> > $ cd /path/to/pahole.git
> >
> > $ git diff dwarf_loader.c
> > diff --git a/dwarf_loader.c b/dwarf_loader.c
> > index 5a74035c5708..96ce5db4f5bc 100644
> > --- a/dwarf_loader.c
> > +++ b/dwarf_loader.c
> > @@ -2808,8 +2808,8 @@ static int __cus__load_debug_types(struct
> > conf_load *conf, Dwfl_Module *mod, Dwa
> >         return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -/* Match the define in linux:include/linux/elfnote.h */
> > -#define LINUX_ELFNOTE_BUILD_LTO                0x101
> > +/* Match the define in linux:include/linux/elfnote-lto.h */
> > +#define LINUX_ELFNOTE_LTO_INFO         0x101
> >
> > static bool cus__merging_cu(Dwarf *dw, Elf *elf)
> > {
> > @@ -2827,7 +2827,7 @@ static bool cus__merging_cu(Dwarf *dw, Elf *elf)
> >                         size_t name_off, desc_off, offset = 0;
> >                         GElf_Nhdr hdr;
> >                         while ((offset = gelf_getnote(data, offset,
> > &hdr, &name_off, &desc_off)) != 0) {
> > -                               if (hdr.n_type != LINUX_ELFNOTE_BUILD_LTO)
> > +                               if (hdr.n_type != LINUX_ELFNOTE_LTO_INFO)
> >                                         continue;
> >
> >                                 /* owner is Linux */
>
> Ya, LINUX_ELFNOTE_BUILD_LTO is initially proposed macro name but later
> the formal kernel patch used LINUX_ELFNOTE_LTO_INFO. Could you submit
> a pahole for this so it is consistent with kernel? Thanks!
>

Patch sent, see:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230120201203.10785-1-sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx/

-Sedat-

> >
> > $ cd /path/to/linux.git
> >
> > $ git describe
> > v6.2-rc4-77-gd368967cb103
> >
> > $ git grep LINUX_ELFNOTE_LTO_INFO include/linux/elfnote-lto.h
> > include/linux/elfnote-lto.h:#define LINUX_ELFNOTE_LTO_INFO      0x101
> > include/linux/elfnote-lto.h:#define BUILD_LTO_INFO
> > ELFNOTE32("Linux", LINUX_ELFNOTE_LTO_INFO, 1)
> > include/linux/elfnote-lto.h:#define BUILD_LTO_INFO
> > ELFNOTE32("Linux", LINUX_ELFNOTE_LTO_INFO, 0)
> > dileks@iniza:~/src/linux/git$ git describe
> > v6.2-rc4-195-gf609936e078d
> >
> > -EOT-



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux