On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 9:47 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Em Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 02:41:12PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > Anyway, just a data point, I'll check if I'm missing installing it > > somewhere. > > Just asked for libbpf-dev to be installed on the debian:11 container: > > [perfbuilder@five 11]$ dsh debian:11 > $ bash > perfbuilder@589d1572e8cf:/$ ls -la /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbpf.so.0 > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jan 10 2021 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbpf.so.0 -> libbpf.so.0.3.0 > perfbuilder@589d1572e8cf:/$ dpkg -l | grep bpf > ii libbpf-dev:amd64 1:0.3-2 amd64 eBPF helper library (development files) > ii libbpf0:amd64 1:0.3-2 amd64 eBPF helper library (shared library) > ii libpfm4:amd64 4.11.1+git32-gd0b85fb-1 amd64 Library to program the performance monitoring events > perfbuilder@589d1572e8cf:/$ > > - Arnaldo Right, the old/ancient libbpf-s are gross, but Debian doesn't use LIBBPF_DYNAMIC which also isn't a default build option. I guess we could say there's some testing impact from this cleanup, but I'm not sure we care. Thanks, Ian
