On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 11:50:37AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 10:05:51PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > Namhyung Kim (8): > > perf/core: Save the dynamic parts of sample data size > > perf/core: Add perf_sample_save_callchain() helper > > perf/core: Add perf_sample_save_raw_data() helper > > perf/core: Add perf_sample_save_brstack() helper > > perf/core: Set data->sample_flags in perf_prepare_sample() > > perf/core: Do not pass header for sample id init > > perf/core: Introduce perf_prepare_header() > > perf/core: Call perf_prepare_sample() before running BPF > > Thanks!, > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks Peter. The patches look good to me as well. How do you want to route them bpf-next or tip ? Namhyung, I'd also like to see a follow up patch with a selftest/bpf for this. BPF CI didn't have a chance to really test the set, since there is a build issue on s390 due to llvm upstream repo. We're aware and working on that.
