Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] virtio-net: set up xdp for multi buffer packets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





在 2023/1/13 上午10:49, Jason Wang 写道:

在 2023/1/3 14:40, Heng Qi 写道:
When the xdp program sets xdp.frags, which means it can process
multi-buffer packets over larger MTU, so we continue to support xdp.
But for single-buffer xdp, we should keep checking for MTU.

Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 10 ++++++----
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
index 443aa7b8f0ad..60e199811212 100644
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -3074,7 +3074,9 @@ static int virtnet_restore_guest_offloads(struct virtnet_info *vi)   static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
                 struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
  {
-    unsigned long int max_sz = PAGE_SIZE - sizeof(struct padded_vnet_hdr);
+    unsigned int room = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM +
+                       sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
+    unsigned int max_sz = PAGE_SIZE - room - ETH_HLEN;
      struct virtnet_info *vi = netdev_priv(dev);
      struct bpf_prog *old_prog;
      u16 xdp_qp = 0, curr_qp;
@@ -3095,9 +3097,9 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
          return -EINVAL;
      }
  -    if (dev->mtu > max_sz) {
-        NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "MTU too large to enable XDP");
-        netdev_warn(dev, "XDP requires MTU less than %lu\n", max_sz);
+    if (prog && !prog->aux->xdp_has_frags && dev->mtu > max_sz) {
+        NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "MTU too large to enable XDP without frags"); +        netdev_warn(dev, "single-buffer XDP requires MTU less than %u\n", max_sz);
          return -EINVAL;
      }


I think we probably need to backport this to -stable. So I suggest to move/squash the check of !prog->aux->xdp_has_frags to one of the following patch.

Sure, and you are right.

Thanks.


With this,

Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux