On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:54:54PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:06:00PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > Another example, but in this case it's real, is ADDR. We cannot update > > the data->addr just because filtered_sample_type has PHYS_ADDR or > > DATA_PAGE_SIZE as it'd lose the original value. > > Hmm, how about something like so? > > /* > * if (flags & s) flags |= d; // without branches > */ > static __always_inline unsigned long > __cond_set(unsigned long flags, unsigned long s, unsigned long d) > { > return flags | (d * !!(flags & s)); > } > > Then: > > fst = sample_type; > fst = __cond_set(fst, PERF_SAMPLE_CODE_PAGE_SIZE, PERF_SAMPLE_IP); > fst = __cond_set(fst, PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE | > PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR, PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR); > fst = __cond_set(fst, PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER, PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER); > fst &= ~data->sample_flags; > Hmm, I think it's better to write this like: static __always_inline unsigned long __cond_set(unsigned long flags, unsigned long s, unsigned long d) { return d * !!(flags & s); } fst = sample_type; fst |= __cond_set(sample_type, PERF_SAMPLE_CODE_PAGE_SIZE, PERF_SAMPLE_IP); fst |= __cond_set(sample_type, PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_PAGE_SIZE | PERF_SAMPLE_PHYS_ADDR, PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR); fst |= __cond_set(sample_type, PERF_SAMPLE_STACK_USER, PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER); fst &= ~data->sample_flags; Which should be identical but has less data dependencies and thus gives an OoO CPU more leaway to paralleize things.