Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] bpf: remove the do_idr_lock parameter from bpf_prog_free_id()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/09, Paul Moore wrote:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 2:45 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 7:44 AM Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > It was determined that the do_idr_lock parameter to
> > bpf_prog_free_id() was not necessary as it should always be true.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> nit: I believe it's been suggested several times by different people

As much as I would like to follow all of the kernel relevant mailing
lists, I'm short about 30hrs in a day to do that, and you were the
first one I saw suggesting that change :)

Sure, sure, I'm just stating it for the other people on the CC. So maybe
we can drop this line when applying.

> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
paul-moore.com



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux