Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/17] bpf: Introduce device-bound XDP programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 4:41 PM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 1/4/23 1:59 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > @@ -199,12 +197,12 @@ int bpf_prog_offload_init(struct bpf_prog *prog, union bpf_attr *attr)
> >           attr->prog_type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP)
> >               return -EINVAL;
> >
> > -     if (attr->prog_flags)
> > +     if (attr->prog_flags & ~BPF_F_XDP_DEV_BOUND_ONLY)
> >               return -EINVAL;
> >
> > -     offload = kzalloc(sizeof(*offload), GFP_USER);
>
> The kzalloc is still needed. Although a latter patch added it bad, it is better
> not to miss it in the first place.

Oh, good catch, probably lost during reshuffling some changes around, will undo.


> > -     if (!offload)
> > -             return -ENOMEM;
> > +     if (attr->prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS &&
> > +         attr->prog_flags & BPF_F_XDP_DEV_BOUND_ONLY)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> >
> >       offload->prog = prog;
> >
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux