On 04/01/2023 14:28, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Tue, 03 Jan 2023 16:19:49 +0100 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Hmm, good question! I don't think we've ever explicitly documented any
assumptions one way or the other. My own mental model has certainly
always assumed the first frag would continue to be the same size as in
non-multi-buf packets.
Interesting! :) My mental model was closer to GRO by frags
so the linear part would have no data, just headers.
That is assumption as well.
Right, okay, so how many headers? Only Ethernet, or all the way up to
L4 (TCP/UDP)?
I do seem to recall a discussion around the header/data split for TCP
specifically, but I think I mentally put that down as "something people
may way to do at some point in the future", which is why it hasn't made
it into my own mental model (yet?) :)
-Toke
I don't think that all the different GRO layers assume having their
headers/data in the linear part. IMO they will just perform better if
these parts are already there. Otherwise, the GRO flow manages, and
pulls the needed amount into the linear part.
As examples, see calls to gro_pull_from_frag0 in net/core/gro.c, and the
call to pskb_may_pull() from skb_gro_header_slow().
This resembles the bpf_xdp_load_bytes() API used here in the xdp prog.
The context of my questions is that I'm looking for the right memory
scheme for adding xdp-mb support to mlx5e striding RQ.
In striding RQ, the RX buffer consists of "strides" of a fixed size set
by the driver. An incoming packet is written to the buffer starting from
the beginning of the next available stride, consuming as much strides as
needed.
Due to the need for headroom and tailroom, there's no easy way of
building the xdp_buf in place (around the packet), so it should go to a
side buffer.
By using 0-length linear part in a side buffer, I can address two
challenging issues: (1) save the in-driver headers memcpy (copy might
still exist in the xdp program though), and (2) conform to the
"fragments of the same size" requirement/assumption in xdp-mb.
Otherwise, if we pull from frag[0] into the linear part, frag[0] becomes
smaller than the next fragments.
Regards,
Tariq
