On 12/18/22 8:15 PM, xiangxia.m.yue@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@xxxxxxxxx> This testing show how to reproduce deadlock in special case. We update htab map in Task and NMI context. Task can be interrupted by NMI, if the same map bucket was locked, there will be a deadlock. * map max_entries is 2. * NMI using key 4 and Task context using key 20. * so same bucket index but map_locked index is different. The selftest use perf to produce the NMI and fentry nmi_handle. Note that bpf_overflow_handler checks bpf_prog_active, but in bpf update map syscall increase this counter in bpf_disable_instrumentation. Then fentry nmi_handle and update hash map will reproduce the issue. Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Song Liu <song@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x | 1 + .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/htab_deadlock.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/htab_deadlock.c | 32 ++++++++ 4 files changed, 109 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/htab_deadlock.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/htab_deadlock.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 index 99cc33c51eaa..87e8fc9c9df2 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.aarch64 @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ fexit_test # fexit_attach unexpected error get_func_args_test # get_func_args_test__attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) (trampoline) get_func_ip_test # get_func_ip_test__attach unexpected error: -524 (errno 524) (trampoline) htab_update/reenter_update +htab_deadlock # failed to find kernel BTF type ID of 'nmi_handle': -3 (trampoline) kfree_skb # attach fentry unexpected error: -524 (trampoline) kfunc_call/subprog # extern (var ksym) 'bpf_prog_active': not found in kernel BTF kfunc_call/subprog_lskel # skel unexpected error: -2 diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x index 585fcf73c731..735239b31050 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ get_func_args_test # trampoline get_func_ip_test # get_func_ip_test__attach unexpected error: -524 (trampoline) get_stack_raw_tp # user_stack corrupted user stack (no backchain userspace) htab_update # failed to attach: ERROR: strerror_r(-524)=22 (trampoline) +htab_deadlock # failed to find kernel BTF type ID of 'nmi_handle': -3 (trampoline) kfree_skb # attach fentry unexpected error: -524 (trampoline) kfunc_call # 'bpf_prog_active': not found in kernel BTF (?) kfunc_dynptr_param # JIT does not support calling kernel function (kfunc) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/htab_deadlock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/htab_deadlock.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..137dce8f1346 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/htab_deadlock.c @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2022 DiDi Global Inc. */ +#define _GNU_SOURCE +#include <pthread.h> +#include <sched.h> +#include <test_progs.h> + +#include "htab_deadlock.skel.h" + +static int perf_event_open(void) +{ + struct perf_event_attr attr = {0}; + int pfd; + + /* create perf event on CPU 0 */ + attr.size = sizeof(attr); + attr.type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE; + attr.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES; + attr.freq = 1; + attr.sample_freq = 1000; + pfd = syscall(__NR_perf_event_open, &attr, -1, 0, -1, PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC); + + return pfd >= 0 ? pfd : -errno; +} + +void test_htab_deadlock(void) +{ + unsigned int val = 0, key = 20; + struct bpf_link *link = NULL; + struct htab_deadlock *skel; + int err, i, pfd; + cpu_set_t cpus; + + skel = htab_deadlock__open_and_load(); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open_and_load")) + return; + + err = htab_deadlock__attach(skel); + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_attach")) + goto clean_skel; + + /* NMI events. */ + pfd = perf_event_open(); + if (pfd < 0) { + if (pfd == -ENOENT || pfd == -EOPNOTSUPP) { + printf("%s:SKIP:no PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES\n", __func__); + test__skip(); + goto clean_skel; + } + if (!ASSERT_GE(pfd, 0, "perf_event_open")) + goto clean_skel; + } + + link = bpf_program__attach_perf_event(skel->progs.bpf_empty, pfd); + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_perf_event")) + goto clean_pfd; + + /* Pinned on CPU 0 */ + CPU_ZERO(&cpus); + CPU_SET(0, &cpus); + pthread_setaffinity_np(pthread_self(), sizeof(cpus), &cpus); + + /* update bpf map concurrently on CPU0 in NMI and Task context. + * there should be no kernel deadlock. + */ + for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++) + bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.htab), + &key, &val, BPF_ANY); + + bpf_link__destroy(link); +clean_pfd: + close(pfd); +clean_skel: + htab_deadlock__destroy(skel); +} diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/htab_deadlock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/htab_deadlock.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d394f95e97c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/htab_deadlock.c @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright (c) 2022 DiDi Global Inc. */ +#include <linux/bpf.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h> + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; + +struct { + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH); + __uint(max_entries, 2); + __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_ZERO_SEED); + __type(key, unsigned int); + __type(value, unsigned int); +} htab SEC(".maps"); + +/* nmi_handle on x86 platform. If changing keyword + * "static" to "inline", this prog load failed. */ +SEC("fentry/nmi_handle")
The above comment is not what I mean. In arch/x86/kernel/nmi.c, we have static int nmi_handle(unsigned int type, struct pt_regs *regs) { ... } ... static noinstr void default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs) { ... handled = nmi_handle(NMI_LOCAL, regs); ... } Since nmi_handle is a static function, it is possible that the function might be inlined in default_do_nmi by the compiler. If this happens, fentry/nmi_handle will not be triggered and the test will pass. So I suggest to change the comment to nmi_handle() is a static function and might be inlined into its caller. If this happens, the test can still pass without previous kernel fix.
+int bpf_nmi_handle(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + unsigned int val = 0, key = 4; + + bpf_map_update_elem(&htab, &key, &val, BPF_ANY); + return 0; +} + +SEC("perf_event") +int bpf_empty(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + return 0; +}