Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 05/15] bpf: XDP metadata RX kfuncs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/12/22 6:35 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index ca22e8b8bd82..de6279725f41 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2477,6 +2477,8 @@ void bpf_offload_dev_netdev_unregister(struct bpf_offload_dev *offdev,
  				       struct net_device *netdev);
  bool bpf_offload_dev_match(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct net_device *netdev);
+void *bpf_dev_bound_resolve_kfunc(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 func_id);
+

This probably requires an inline version for !CONFIG_NET.

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index d434a994ee04..c3e501e3e39c 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -2097,6 +2097,13 @@ bool bpf_prog_map_compatible(struct bpf_map *map,
  	if (fp->kprobe_override)
  		return false;
+ /* When tail-calling from a non-dev-bound program to a dev-bound one,
+	 * XDP metadata helpers should be disabled. Until it's implemented,
+	 * prohibit adding dev-bound programs to tail-call maps.
+	 */
+	if (bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(fp->aux))
+		return false;
+
  	spin_lock(&map->owner.lock);
  	if (!map->owner.type) {
  		/* There's no owner yet where we could check for
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/offload.c b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
index f714c941f8ea..3b6c9023f24d 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/offload.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
@@ -757,6 +757,29 @@ void bpf_dev_bound_netdev_unregister(struct net_device *dev)
  	up_write(&bpf_devs_lock);
  }
+void *bpf_dev_bound_resolve_kfunc(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 func_id)
+{
+	const struct xdp_metadata_ops *ops;
+	void *p = NULL;
+
+	down_read(&bpf_devs_lock);
+	if (!prog->aux->offload || !prog->aux->offload->netdev)

This happens when netdev is unregistered in the middle of bpf_prog_load and the bpf_offload_dev_match() will eventually fail during dev_xdp_attach()? A comment will be useful.

+		goto out;
+
+	ops = prog->aux->offload->netdev->xdp_metadata_ops;
+	if (!ops)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (func_id == xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP))
+		p = ops->xmo_rx_timestamp;
+	else if (func_id == xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_HASH))
+		p = ops->xmo_rx_hash;
+out:
+	up_read(&bpf_devs_lock);
+
+	return p;
+}
+
  static int __init bpf_offload_init(void)
  {
  	int err;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 203d8cfeda70..e61fe0472b9b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -15479,12 +15479,35 @@ static int fixup_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
  			    struct bpf_insn *insn_buf, int insn_idx, int *cnt)
  {
  	const struct bpf_kfunc_desc *desc;
+	void *xdp_kfunc;
if (!insn->imm) {
  		verbose(env, "invalid kernel function call not eliminated in verifier pass\n");
  		return -EINVAL;
  	}
+ *cnt = 0;
+
+	if (xdp_is_metadata_kfunc_id(insn->imm)) {
+		if (!bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(env->prog->aux)) {

The "xdp_is_metadata_kfunc_id() && (!bpf_prog_is_dev_bound() || bpf_prog_is_offloaded())" test should have been done much earlier in add_kfunc_call(). Then the later stage of the verifier does not have to keep worrying about it like here.

nit. may be rename xdp_is_metadata_kfunc_id() to bpf_dev_bound_kfunc_id() and hide the "!bpf_prog_is_dev_bound() || bpf_prog_is_offloaded()" test into bpf_dev_bound_kfunc_check(&env->log, env->prog).

The change in fixup_kfunc_call could then become:

	if (bpf_dev_bound_kfunc_id(insn->imm)) {
		xdp_kfunc = bpf_dev_bound_resolve_kfunc(env->prog, insn->imm);
		/* ... */
	}

+			verbose(env, "metadata kfuncs require device-bound program\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		if (bpf_prog_is_offloaded(env->prog->aux)) {
+			verbose(env, "metadata kfuncs can't be offloaded\n");
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		xdp_kfunc = bpf_dev_bound_resolve_kfunc(env->prog, insn->imm);
+		if (xdp_kfunc) {
+			insn->imm = BPF_CALL_IMM(xdp_kfunc);
+			return 0;
+		}
+
+		/* fallback to default kfunc when not supported by netdev */
+	}
+





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux