On Fri, 9 Dec 2022 09:46:20 -0800 Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > > Is partial inlining hard? (inline just the check and generate a full > > call for the read, ending up with the same code as with _supported()) > > I'm assuming you're suggesting to do this partial inlining manually > (as in, writing the code to output this bytecode)? > This probably also falls into the "manual bpf asm generation tech debt" bucket? > LMK if I missed your point. Maybe just ignore that, I'm not sure how the unrolling of the _supported() calls was expected to work in the first place.
