Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 15:09:47 -0800 you wrote:
> This series adds a rbtree datastructure following the "next-gen
> datastructure" precedent set by recently-added linked-list [0]. This is
> a reimplementation of previous rbtree RFC [1] to use kfunc + kptr
> instead of adding a new map type. This series adds a smaller set of API
> functions than that RFC - just the minimum needed to support current
> cgfifo example scheduler in ongoing sched_ext effort [2], namely:
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,01/13] bpf: Loosen alloc obj test in verifier's reg_btf_record
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/d8939cb0a03c
- [bpf-next,02/13] bpf: map_check_btf should fail if btf_parse_fields fails
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,03/13] bpf: Minor refactor of ref_set_release_on_unlock
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,04/13] bpf: rename list_head -> datastructure_head in field info types
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,05/13] bpf: Add basic bpf_rb_{root,node} support
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,06/13] bpf: Add bpf_rbtree_{add,remove,first} kfuncs
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,07/13] bpf: Add support for bpf_rb_root and bpf_rb_node in kfunc args
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,08/13] bpf: Add callback validation to kfunc verifier logic
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,09/13] bpf: Special verifier handling for bpf_rbtree_{remove, first}
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,10/13] bpf, x86: BPF_PROBE_MEM handling for insn->off < 0
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,11/13] bpf: Add bpf_rbtree_{add,remove,first} decls to bpf_experimental.h
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,12/13] libbpf: Make BTF mandatory if program BTF has spin_lock or alloc_obj type
(no matching commit)
- [bpf-next,13/13] selftests/bpf: Add rbtree selftests
(no matching commit)
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
