Pu Lehui <pulehui@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Wouldn't that work? >> > > It definitely works. But auipc+addi may be some holes, while > lui+addi+slli support all the address of kernel and module. And this > might be help for the future feature porting. We're already using auipc/jalr for calls, and I'd say it *very* unlikely that we'll hit the non-covered range. I'd say go with auipc/addi + error, and we can change if this really is a problem.
