Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] bpf: Handle MEM_RCU type properly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>:

On Sat, 3 Dec 2022 10:45:57 -0800 you wrote:
> Patch set [1] added rcu support for bpf programs. In [1], a rcu
> pointer is considered to be trusted and not null. This is actually
> not true in some cases. The rcu pointer could be null, and for non-null
> rcu pointer, it may have reference count of 0. This small patch set
> fixed this problem. Patch 1 is the kernel fix. Patch 2 adjusted
> selftests properly. Patch 3 added documentation for newly-introduced
> KF_RCU flag.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2,1/3] bpf: Handle MEM_RCU type properly
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/fca1aa75518c
  - [bpf-next,v2,2/3] selftests/bpf: Fix rcu_read_lock test with new MEM_RCU semantics
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8723ec22a31d
  - [bpf-next,v2,3/3] docs/bpf: Add KF_RCU documentation
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f53625649888

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux