Re: [PATCH bpf-next,v4 2/4] xfrm: interface: Add unstable helpers for setting/getting XFRM metadata from TC-BPF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/2/22 1:59 AM, Eyal Birger wrote:
+__used noinline
+int bpf_skb_set_xfrm_info(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx,
+			  const struct bpf_xfrm_info *from)
+{
+	struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *)skb_ctx;
+	struct metadata_dst *md_dst;
+	struct xfrm_md_info *info;
+
+	if (unlikely(skb_metadata_dst(skb)))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	md_dst = this_cpu_ptr(xfrm_md_dst);
+
+	info = &md_dst->u.xfrm_info;
+
+	info->if_id = from->if_id;
+	info->link = from->link;
+	skb_dst_force(skb);
+	info->dst_orig = skb_dst(skb);
+
+	dst_hold((struct dst_entry *)md_dst);
+	skb_dst_set(skb, (struct dst_entry *)md_dst);


I may be missed something obvious and this just came to my mind,

What stops cleanup_xfrm_interface_bpf() being run while skb is still holding the md_dst?

[ ... ]

+static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set xfrm_interface_kfunc_set = {
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	.set   = &xfrm_ifc_kfunc_set,
+};
+
+int __init register_xfrm_interface_bpf(void)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	xfrm_md_dst = metadata_dst_alloc_percpu(0, METADATA_XFRM,
+						GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!xfrm_md_dst)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	err = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+					&xfrm_interface_kfunc_set);
+	if (err < 0) {
+		metadata_dst_free_percpu(xfrm_md_dst);
+		return err;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void cleanup_xfrm_interface_bpf(void)
+{
+	metadata_dst_free_percpu(xfrm_md_dst);
+}




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux