Re: [PATCH ipsec-next,v2 2/3] xfrm: interface: Add unstable helpers for setting/getting XFRM metadata from TC-BPF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/30/22 9:55 PM, Eyal Birger wrote:
+
+     info->if_id = from->if_id;
+     info->link = from->link;
+     skb_dst_force(skb);
+     info->dst_orig = skb_dst(skb);
+
+     dst_hold((struct dst_entry *)md_dst);
+     skb_dst_set(skb, (struct dst_entry *)md_dst);
+     return 0;
+}
+
+__diag_pop()
+
+BTF_SET8_START(xfrm_ifc_kfunc_set)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_skb_get_xfrm_info)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_skb_set_xfrm_info)
+BTF_SET8_END(xfrm_ifc_kfunc_set)
+
+static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set xfrm_interface_kfunc_set = {
+     .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+     .set   = &xfrm_ifc_kfunc_set,
+};
+
+int __init register_xfrm_interface_bpf(void)
+{
+     int err;
+
+     xfrm_md_dst = metadata_dst_alloc_percpu(0, METADATA_XFRM,
+                                             GFP_KERNEL);

May be DEFINE_PER_CPU() instead?

Are you suggesting duplicating the dst init/cleanup logic here?
Personally given that this happens once at module load, I think it's best to
use the existing infrastructure, but am willing to add this here if you think
it's better.

Agree, staying with the current patch is better. I somehow thought metadata_dst_alloc_percpu() was newly added in this patch also.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux