Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: avoid enum forward-declarations in public API in C++ mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:00:12 -0800 you wrote:
> C++ enum forward declarations are fundamentally not compatible with pure
> C enum definitions, and so libbpf's use of `enum bpf_stats_type;`
> forward declaration in libbpf/bpf.h public API header is causing C++
> compilation issues.
> 
> More details can be found in [0], but it comes down to C++ supporting
> enum forward declaration only with explicitly specified backing type:
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,1/2] libbpf: avoid enum forward-declarations in public API in C++ mode
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b42693415b86
  - [bpf-next,2/2] selftests/bpf: make sure enum-less bpf_enable_stats() API works in C++ mode
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/f8186bf65ae6

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux