Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] selftests/vm: extend test_vmalloc to test execmem_* APIs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] selftests/vm: extend test_vmalloc to test execmem_* APIs
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:22:14 +0100
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>, bpf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-mm@xxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx, rppt@xxxxxxxxxx, mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CAPhsuW6zOVjK5bvS_A=RNUAExeepSPrpE7xWOOAq6W5qJ3m=vA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)

On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 09:31:24AM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> I guess we can just drop 3/6 of the set, and everything else would just work.

Yes.

References:
- [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/6] execmem_alloc for BPF programs
  - From: Song Liu
- [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] selftests/vm: extend test_vmalloc to test execmem_* APIs
  - From: Song Liu
- Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] selftests/vm: extend test_vmalloc to test execmem_* APIs
  - From: Christoph Hellwig
- Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] selftests/vm: extend test_vmalloc to test execmem_* APIs
  - From: Song Liu

Prev by Date: Re: Calling kfuncs in modules - BTF mismatch?
Next by Date: Re: [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/11] xdp: hints via kfuncs
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] selftests/vm: extend test_vmalloc to test execmem_* APIs
Next by thread: [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/6] vmalloc: introduce register_text_tail_vm()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Samsung SoC] [Linux Rockchip SoC] [Linux Actions SoC] [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors] [Linux NFS] [Linux NILFS] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux