Re: [PATCH bpf-next v8 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_rcu_read_lock()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/22/22 5:39 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
On 11/22/22 5:13 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:


On 11/22/22 4:56 PM, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
On 11/22/22 11:53 AM, Yonghong Song wrote:
+SEC("?fentry.s/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_nanosleep")
+int task_acquire(void *ctx)
+{
+    struct task_struct *task, *real_parent;
+
+    task = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
+    bpf_rcu_read_lock();
+    real_parent = task->real_parent;
+    /* acquire a reference which can be used outside rcu read lock region */
+    real_parent = bpf_task_acquire(real_parent);
Does the bpf_task_acquire() kfunc need a change to do refcount_inc_not_zero() and KF_RET_NULL?

We have this definition in kernel:
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_acquire, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)

So the argument is trusted args so, either marked as PTR_TRUSTED/MEM_ALLOC or have a reference acquired already, so
I guess we should be fine here.


The verifier part is fine on {KF_TRUSTED_ARGS, PTR_TRUSTED}.

iiuc, PTR_TRUSTED means the kfunc can safely dereference the pointer because the ptr has not been freed yet but does not mean its refcnt > 0 and not on its way to be freed after the rcu gp.

If real_parent's refcnt is 0 here, bpf_task_acquire() will resurrect a task which is on its way to be freed and the task can be stored in a map, so a UAF.


This could be addressed as a follow up though since it is not specific to this set.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux