Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] bpf, docs: Document BPF_MAP_TYPE_BLOOM_FILTER

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 6:13 AM Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add documentation for BPF_MAP_TYPE_BLOOM_FILTER including
> kernel BPF helper usage, userspace usage and examples.
>
> Signed-off-by: Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>

LGTM. Thanks for adding this.

Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> v1 -> v2:
> - Fix sphinx warnings for sphinx >= 3.1
>
>  Documentation/bpf/map_bloom_filter.rst | 174 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 174 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/bpf/map_bloom_filter.rst
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/bpf/map_bloom_filter.rst b/Documentation/bpf/map_bloom_filter.rst
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b96fd5f13e1f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/bpf/map_bloom_filter.rst
> @@ -0,0 +1,174 @@
> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +.. Copyright (C) 2022 Red Hat, Inc.
> +
> +=========================
> +BPF_MAP_TYPE_BLOOM_FILTER
> +=========================
> +
> +.. note::
> +   - ``BPF_MAP_TYPE_BLOOM_FILTER`` was introduced in kernel version 5.16
> +
> +``BPF_MAP_TYPE_BLOOM_FILTER`` provides a BPF bloom filter map. Bloom
> +filters are a space-efficient probabilistic data structure used to
> +quickly test whether an element exists in a set. In a bloom filter,
> +false positives are possible whereas false negatives are not.
> +
> +The bloom filter map does not have keys, only values. When the bloom
> +filter map is created, it must be created with a ``key_size`` of 0.  The
> +bloom filter map supports two operations:
> +
> +- push: adding an element to the map
> +- peek: determining whether an element is present in the map
> +
> +BPF programs must use ``bpf_map_push_elem`` to add an element to the
> +bloom filter map and ``bpf_map_peek_elem`` to query the map. These
> +operations are exposed to userspace applications using the existing
> +``bpf`` syscall in the following way:
> +
> +- ``BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM`` -> push
> +- ``BPF_MAP_LOOKUP_ELEM`` -> peek
> +
> +The ``max_entries`` size that is specified at map creation time is used
> +to approximate a reasonable bitmap size for the bloom filter, and is not
> +otherwise strictly enforced. If the user wishes to insert more entries
> +into the bloom filter than ``max_entries``, this may lead to a higher
> +false positive rate.
> +
> +The number of hashes to use for the bloom filter is configurable using
> +the lower 4 bits of ``map_extra`` in ``union bpf_attr`` at map creation
> +time. If no number is specified, the default used will be 5 hash
> +functions. In general, using more hashes decreases both the false
> +positive rate and the speed of a lookup.
> +
> +It is not possible to delete elements from a bloom filter map. A bloom
> +filter map may be used as an inner map. The user is responsible for
> +synchronising concurrent updates and lookups to ensure no false negative
> +lookups occur.
> +
> +Usage
> +=====
> +
> +Kernel BPF
> +----------
> +
> +bpf_map_push_elem()
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> +   long bpf_map_push_elem(struct bpf_map *map, const void *value, u64 flags)
> +
> +A ``value`` can be added to a bloom filter using the
> +``bpf_map_push_elem()`` helper. The ``flags`` parameter must be set to
> +``BPF_ANY`` when adding an entry to the bloom filter. This helper
> +returns ``0`` on success, or negative error in case of failure.
> +
> +bpf_map_peek_elem()
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> +   long bpf_map_peek_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *value)
> +
> +The ``bpf_map_peek_elem()`` helper is used to determine whether
> +``value`` is present in the bloom filter map. This helper returns ``0``
> +if ``value`` is probably present in the map, or ``-ENOENT`` if ``value``
> +is definitely not present in the map.
> +
> +Userspace
> +---------
> +
> +bpf_map_update_elem()
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> +   int bpf_map_update_elem (int fd, const void *key, const void *value, __u64 flags)
> +
> +A userspace program can add a ``value`` to a bloom filter using libbpf's
> +``bpf_map_update_elem`` function. The ``key`` parameter must be set to
> +``NULL`` and ``flags`` must be set to ``BPF_ANY``. Returns ``0`` on
> +success, or negative error in case of failure.
> +
> +bpf_map_lookup_elem()
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> +   int bpf_map_lookup_elem (int fd, const void *key, void *value)
> +
> +A userspace program can determine the presence of ``value`` in a bloom
> +filter using libbpf's ``bpf_map_lookup_elem`` function. The ``key``
> +parameter must be set to ``NULL``. Returns ``0`` if ``value`` is
> +probably present in the map, or ``-ENOENT`` if ``value`` is definitely
> +not present in the map.
> +
> +Examples
> +========
> +
> +Kernel BPF
> +----------
> +
> +This snippet shows how to declare a bloom filter in a BPF program:
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> +    struct {
> +            __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_BLOOM_FILTER);
> +            __type(value, __u32);
> +            __uint(max_entries, 1000);
> +            __uint(map_extra, 3);
> +    } bloom_filter SEC(".maps");
> +
> +This snippet shows how to determine presence of a value in a bloom
> +filter in a BPF program:
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> +    void *lookup(__u32 key)
> +    {
> +            if (bpf_map_peek_elem(&bloom_filter, &key) == 0) {
> +                    /* Verify not a false positive and fetch an associated
> +                     * value using a secondary lookup, e.g. in a hash table
> +                     */
> +                    return bpf_map_lookup_elem(&hash_table, &key);
> +            }
> +            return 0;
> +    }
> +
> +Userspace
> +---------
> +
> +This snippet shows how to use libbpf to create a bloom filter map from
> +userspace:
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> +    int create_bloom()
> +    {
> +            LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_map_create_opts, opts,
> +                        .map_extra = 3);             /* number of hashes */
> +
> +            return bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_BLOOM_FILTER,
> +                                  "ipv6_bloom",      /* name */
> +                                  0,                 /* key size, must be zero */
> +                                  sizeof(ipv6_addr), /* value size */
> +                                  10000,             /* max entries */
> +                                  &opts);            /* create options */
> +    }
> +
> +This snippet shows how to add an element to a bloom filter from
> +userspace:
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> +    int add_element(__u32 value)
> +    {
> +            return bpf_map_update_elem(bloom_fd, 0, &value, BPF_ANY);

nit: the second arg is a pointer so I think "NULL" (instead of 0) is
the convention?

It might also be useful to demonstrate how to get bloom_fd (eg using
bpf_map__fd helper).

> +    }
> +
> +
> +References
> +==========
> +
> +https://lwn.net/ml/bpf/20210831225005.2762202-1-joannekoong@xxxxxx/
> --
> 2.38.1
>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux