Re: [RFC 0/1] BPF tracing for arm64 using fprobe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:09:21 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 01:06:08PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > How do I know that a function return was modified by BPF? If I'm debugging
> > something, is it obvious to the developer that is debugging an issue
> > (perhaps unaware of what BPF programs are loaded on the users machine),
> > that the return of a function was tweaked by BPF and that could be the
> > source of the bug?
> 
> Have it taint the kernel if something is overridden ;-) Then we can all
> ignore the report until it comes back without taint.

Hmm, indeed. BTW, error injection should set that too.

Thanks,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@xxxxxxxxxx>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux