Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/2] bpf: Disallow calling bpf_obj_new_impl on bpf_mem_alloc_init failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 02:16:25AM +0530, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> 
> > Also please get rid of special_kfunc_set and
> > and btf_id_set_contains(&special_kfunc_set, meta.func_id)
> > That additional check is unnecessary as well.
> > special_kfunc_list is enough.
> 
> It provides an easy way to do 'btf == vmlinux && is_special_kfunc'.
> Otherwise if I drop it, every check matching func_id == special_kfunc_list will
> also have to do btf == vmlinux check (because eventually we want to drop to the
> other branches that should work for non-vmlinux BTF as well).
> 
> What I mean is:
> 	if (btf == vmlinux && btf_id_set_contains(special_kfunc_set)) {
> 		if (func_id == special_kfunc_list) {
> 		} else if (func_id == special_kfunc_list) {
> 		} else {
> 		}
> 	} else if (!__btf_type_is_struct) {
> 	} else /* struct */ {
> 	}
> 
> will become:
> 	if (btf == vmlinux && func_id == special_kfunc_list) {
> 	} else if (btf == vmlinux && func_id == special_kfunc_list) {
> 	} else if (!__btf_type_is_struct) {
> 	} else /* struct */ {
> 	}

One less indent looks better.
Repeated btf == vmlinux doesn't bother me.
There is no use for this special_kfunc_set. It just wastes memory.
So I still think it's better to remove it.

While at it please swap branches !__btf_type_is_struct to __btf_type_is_struct:
  else if (__btf_type_is_struct) {
    regs[BPF_REG_0].type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID
  } else { // handle 'void *' return aka r0_size
would read better.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux