Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] veth: fix double napi enable

[Heng Qi <hengqi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> While investigating a related issue I stumbled upon another
> oops, reproducible as the follow:
>
> ip link add type veth
> ip link set dev veth0 xdp object <obj>
> ip link set dev veth0 up
> ip link set dev veth1 up
>
> The first link up command will enable the napi instances on
> veth1 and the second link up common will try again the same
> operation, causing the oops.
>
> This change addresses the issue explicitly checking the peer
> is up before enabling its napi instances.
>
> Fixes: 2e0de6366ac1 ("veth: Avoid drop packets when xdp_redirect performs")
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/net/veth.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/veth.c b/drivers/net/veth.c
> index 1384134f7100..d541183e0c66 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/veth.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
> @@ -1343,7 +1343,8 @@ static int veth_open(struct net_device *dev)
> 		if (err)
>  			return err;
>  		/* refer to the logic in veth_xdp_set() */
> -		if (!rtnl_dereference(peer_rq->napi)) {
> +		if (!rtnl_dereference(peer_rq->napi) &&
> +		    (peer->flags & IFF_UP)) {
>  			err = veth_napi_enable(peer);
>  			if (err)
>  				return err;

I have checked the conditions related to enabling and disabling napi for
veth pair. In general, we should check whether napi is disabled before
enabling it, and check whether napi is enabled before disabling it. I am
sorry that my previous test cases didn't do better, and we can work
completely with your patchset. As the your patch in link below does
https://lore.kernel.org/all/c59f4adcdd1296ee37cc6bca4d927b8c79158909.1668727939.git.pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx/

Is this patch more uniform like the following:

--- a/drivers/net/veth.c
+++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
@@ -1348,7 +1348,8 @@ static int veth_open(struct net_device *dev)
                        if (err)
                                return err;
                }
-       } else if (veth_gro_requested(dev) || peer_priv->_xdp_prog) {
+       } else if ((veth_gro_requested(dev) || peer_priv->_xdp_prog) &&
+                   !rtnl_dereference(priv->rq[0].napi)) {
                err = veth_napi_enable(dev);
                if (err)
                        return err;

Thanks.