On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:40 PM Hou Tao <houtao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Also pls target this kind of change to bpf-next especially > > when there is a consideration to revert other fixes. > > This kind of questionable fixes are not suitable for bpf tree > > regardless of how long the "bug" was present. > The reason to post the fix to bpf tree instead bpf-next is that cgroup iterator > is merged in v6.1 and I think it is better to merge the fix into v6.1 instead of > v6.2. And patchset v1 is not a questionable fixes, because iterator link has > already acquired the reference of the start cgroup. These "fixes are not suitable for bpf tree regardless of how long the "bug" was present".
