Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpftool: Use strcmp() instead of is_prefix() to check parameters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/14, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
In the current code, the parameters check of bpftool seems not correct,
for example, "bpftool batch file FILE" is the expected command format,
but "bpftool b f FILE" is recognized as valid, so use strcmp() instead
of is_prefix() to check parameters.

That's by design and is similar to what iproute2 commands are doing.

Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  tools/bpf/bpftool/main.c | 4 ++--
  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.c
index 741e50e..4ef87c2 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/main.c
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ int cmd_select(const struct cmd *cmds, int argc, char **argv,
  		return cmds[0].func(argc, argv);

  	for (i = 0; cmds[i].cmd; i++) {
-		if (is_prefix(*argv, cmds[i].cmd)) {
+		if (!strcmp(*argv, cmds[i].cmd)) {
  			if (!cmds[i].func) {
  				p_err("command '%s' is not supported in bootstrap mode",
  				      cmds[i].cmd);
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ static int do_batch(int argc, char **argv)
  	if (argc < 2) {
  		p_err("too few parameters for batch");
  		return -1;
-	} else if (!is_prefix(*argv, "file")) {
+	} else if (strcmp(*argv, "file")) {
  		p_err("expected 'file', got: %s", *argv);
  		return -1;
  	} else if (argc > 2) {
--
2.1.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux