Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/5] execmem_alloc for BPF programs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 9:04 AM Edgecombe, Rick P
<rick.p.edgecombe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
[...]
>
> Similar to the perm_alloc() hacks?
>
> > with similar rodata_alloc() that uses yet another tree in vmalloc?
>
> It would have to group them together at least. Not sure if it needs a
> separate tree or not. I would think permission flags would be better
> than a new function for each memory type.
>
> > How the caching of large pages in vmalloc can be made useful for use
> > cases
> > like secretmem and PKS?
>
> This part is easy I think. If we had an unmapped page allocator it
> could just feed this. Do you have any idea when you might pick up that
> stuff again?
>
> To answer my own question, I think a good first step would be to make
> the interface also work for non-text_poke() so it could really be cross
> arch, then use it for everything except modules. The benefit to the
> other arch's at that point is centralized handling of loading text.

AFAICT, most major archs are introducing text_poke or similar support.
What would be a good non-text_poke major to look into?

Thanks,
Song



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux