Re: [PATCH 3/4] bpf, docs: Use consistent names for the same field

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 7:46 AM <dthaler1968@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> +
> +Thus the 64-bit immediate value is constructed as follows:
> +
> +  imm64 = imm + (next_imm << 32)

Are you sure this is correct considering that 'imm'
was defined earlier in the doc as sign extended?
Maybe use:
imm64 = (u32)imm | ((u64)(u32)next_imm) << 32)
?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SoC]     [Linux Rockchip SoC]     [Linux Actions SoC]     [Linux for Synopsys ARC Processors]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux