On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 6:01 PM Rong Tao <rtoax@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thanks for your reply, actually, i tried another method, which can solved > this error, recognize "socket/xxx" as "socket". However, it maybe influence > other BPF prog or not? What do you think the following patch? Don't fix libbpf, it's not broken. Fix the sample. > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c > @@ -8659,7 +8659,7 @@ static bool sec_def_matches(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec_def, const char *sec_n > return false; > } > > - return strcmp(sec_name, sec_def->sec) == 0; > + return strncmp(sec_name, sec_def->sec, len) == 0; > }